Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Happy new Year to you too and all other members!
Since it’s ASIO in question.. did you checked ASIO panel? there you can select exactly what is output and what is input.
If remember correctly, all in/outs are selected by default. So, select only what you exactly need.Well, if you search web/forums, and oppinions about Behringer, 8 out of 10 will just say "crap".
btw, i like to use old Technics amplifiers. A or AA class. 🙂That is very questionable, also you’ll get very different responses about that. I can tell you what i have now.
Decided to get some monitors for radio but for lowest price. We now have there 2 pairs of Behringer’s 2031P. And now at least one person will say that those are crap, but i liked sound especially when i heard much more expensive ones.
For home i get same but Active. 2031A. Matched pair.Also… you can always use Breakaway’s PEQ to fine calibrate.
Well for streaming small pre-ephasis is always good. Also, As far as i understand things, more details, you talking about, you’ll get from clipper then from limiter. But yea, more clip. Since you are not pushing volume, it might be really better. I would over choose BBP over BBL for streaming.
br
I guess it was some crazy track with lot of highs when i listened..
It would be nice to add pre-emphasis atleast. I know, no pre-emph in BBL.I don’t want you to tell me reasons or personal opinion. I asked for example.
But anyway, good luck in finding mp2 for Edcast.[quote author=”didac”]Effectively, I prefer MP2 because:
1.- The compression artifacts are different, more "beautiful" than MP3 (the sound is more orbed/round).
2.- Is the standard of ALL DVB-T/S and STL Links because is the professional line.
3.- All reasons that have been appointed in this post.[/quote]1. Tests shows otherwise.
2. Are you really belive in that? There IS totally other reason why they usually don’t have Layer-III in those units. We already all agree that mp3 is ‘better’ on lower bitrates. So ask yourself why they still use Layer-II and not Layer-III.However, i still want to hear/see some obvious example where mp2(384) is better then mp3(320).
[quote author=”radio oude stijl”]our brain makes you believe 320 MP3 sounds better, [/quote]
Even if that is true, isn’t that actually important? And not my brain, but brain from avarage listener.Quick test i’ve done is actually compressing 60Hz squere tone into mp3 (320) and mp2 (384).
For mp3 i used lame 3.93.1 and for mp2 i used some latest release from dbPoweramp.Results was way bigger overshots in mp2, almost 1dB more then mp3. Also line was more flat in mp3.
I still don’t get it, why mp2?
In some quick tests i just done, mp3(lame) at 320kbps is better then mp2 at 384kbps. So, why mp2?it would be best if you can borrow few types of cable and try yourself. I never used more then 50ohm cables so i don’t know.
Check cfd/lmr-200/300
http://www.timesmicrowave.com/products/ … /12-15.pdf
http://www.timesmicrowave.com/products/ … /20-21.pdf[quote author=”Milky”]Thinking outside the box, would a 2.4 or 5.8 wireless link have the bandwidth?[/quote]Yeah .. but then he would need something to stream and receive + latency + more possibility to somethings stops.
Anyway, do not try RG58 but try RG213.
Once it helped with 60-65m. You might still have mpx overshots, even with that cable.
