Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
You really want .96. It has stereo challenger and the latest presets. BUT it still doesn’t have Passive Aggressor. Looking forward to the next step!!!
Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. Nobody listens to a station because the bass is sooo over the top. Not in america, greece or timbuktu.
What settings are being used?
I’ve looked at our baseband signal on one of the most advanced monitors/analyzers on the planet. Breakaway is spot-on perfect.
That’s all I can say.
Yes and no. The software does not support this…but you can have a human being turn off the processing 🙂
The breakaway "box" will likely support automated preset switching.
Because an earlier poster wanted to know.
I’m using Jesse’s Stereo Challenger suggested settings. It’s still a work in progress. It’s a little "busy" sounding for my taste…but man does it pop. I like the midrange boost compared to Plutonium.
Eruption:
2.8 (Final Drive)
45r
35p
50s
-25 shape
+6 boostNo NR
clunk 3 slam 3
bass plug 2Frankly, it’s a testament of the "REAL" sound that Breakaway offers. Given my market, I’ve found that tuning Regulator and adjusting the bass has gotten me closest to the sound I’m after. I prefer Plutonium or Rustonium for our internet streams. But, putting it on the air is a different deal. Thanks for the tip. We have SM7’s, AT2020 condensers and a mix of Symetrix (528) and DBX286 processors.
I find that for over-the-air Plutonium/Breakaway actually does a magnificent job on today’s sludgy, hypercompressed material, the AGC does a much better job than the expensive boxes!
Relatively? It’s impossible to undo what’s been done in the mastering facility.
Have you tried something like a compellor in front of the card?
Or are you generating the audio on the machine itself?
A dozen things related to intermod/interference could cause this issue…besides the audio processing.
