DavidMB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 14, 2017 at 4:59 am in reply to: MP3 AAC-HE setups, in a hurry – Updated #14780
    DavidMB
    Member

    One more question. 🙂

    Is there a setting or some command in syntax to attenuate one encoders input for a dB or two in comparison to other (Like He-AAC vs. MP3 encoder)?

    Thanks and br, David

    April 13, 2017 at 7:00 pm in reply to: MP3 AAC-HE setups, in a hurry – Updated #14779
    DavidMB
    Member

    Hi JesseG.

    Ah is that simple – I already tried all synatx examples I could find on the internet and no luck… 🙂

    Thanks for your help and br,
    David

    April 12, 2017 at 5:29 pm in reply to: MP3 AAC-HE setups, in a hurry – Updated #14777
    DavidMB
    Member

    Hi,

    is there any guide on to how to correctly assemble the command line for aacplus codecs?

    Im having trouble with it – it always says encoder problem.

    Thanks for help and br, David

    December 3, 2012 at 11:08 am in reply to: Anyone using BBL + Perfect Declipper? #13550
    DavidMB
    Member

    [quote author=”JesseG”]the current clipper totally owns the limiter, when setup for standard left/right audio, vs fm. there’s lower cpu use versions of it for using less cpu to make it more realistic to use in more places 🙂 like streaming or more channels, etc.

    nothing touches it for peak control that i’ve heard, still. 🙂[/quote]

    So for maximum streaming sound quality you’d suggest to use BBP with 15us preemhasis?

    With Optimized CPU usage setting?

    What really is the difference between Maximum quality setting and Optimized CPU usage setting when BBP is used only for stadard L/R output?

    Thanks for your input JesseG and best regards,
    David

    December 1, 2012 at 8:43 pm in reply to: Anyone using BBL + Perfect Declipper? #13547
    DavidMB
    Member

    Boki, do you think the sound would profit with preemphasis? 15us?

    I tried already with BBP demo if my sound would be better, but I had a strange feeling while using clipper instead of final limiter. One hand it rounds the sound, but on the other hand – much less details in sound…. Altough I’d like to have it as much as is reasonable possible – loudness is not my main priority in this case …

    BR,
    David

    December 1, 2012 at 5:57 pm in reply to: Anyone using BBL + Perfect Declipper? #13545
    DavidMB
    Member

    [quote author=”Boki”]too much highs 😉[/quote]

    Well, I like it open! 😀

    Sound is targeted for mobile devices so low end is a bit more cutted than usual I suppose…

    Thanks for input.

    David

    December 1, 2012 at 5:02 pm in reply to: Anyone using BBL + Perfect Declipper? #13543
    DavidMB
    Member

    Hello!

    Thnx for replaying JesseG.
    Would be more than happy to spend my money on Undo – but until than I did buy Perfect DeClipper and I’m now testing it.

    P. Declipper -> BBL -> Edcast

    You can check here:

    http:\212.18.63.51:9000listen.pls (128kbps stereo mp3 )
    http:\212.18.63.51:9002listen.pls (48kbps stereo HE-AAC V2)

    On this kind of music the difference is very noticable – even on AAC

    BR, David

    November 22, 2012 at 11:56 am in reply to: Composite MPX trough Passive DI BOX ? #13520
    DavidMB
    Member

    Wireless is unfortionaly not an option.

    Boki – i checked – RG213 also has 100pF/m so I guess this would cause the same effect as RG58 or 59 regardig stereo separation…

    RG114 looks very good regarding capacity- but there is a catch – it has 185 OHM impendance – can this cause a problem with composite MPX audio signals?

    Thanx for all the input and best regards,
    David

    November 21, 2012 at 10:50 pm in reply to: Composite MPX trough Passive DI BOX ? #13517
    DavidMB
    Member

    Update:

    I did a little searching on the topic and found out that the best way would be to use Coaxial cable – such as RG58 /59.
    (I attached screenshoot of the orbans datasheet where i found some info on that topic…)
    The problem begins when the capacity of the line begins to rise above 0,047uF. So with RG58/59 the fun ends at aprox 30 meters…. after that stereo separation starts to deteriorate noticably…
    RG58 has 100pF/1m

    How about RG114 (27pF/m) or RG 63 (33pF/m) cable ?

    Any advice would be apriceated. 😀

    Best regards,
    David

    November 9, 2011 at 10:53 pm in reply to: Best Sounding Streams #12671
    DavidMB
    Member

    Here’s what I’ve come up after a lot of tweaking: http://212.18.63.51:9000/listen.pls

    September 21, 2011 at 6:14 am in reply to: Upgrade from BBL to BBP #12585
    DavidMB
    Member

    Hello guys!

    I wodner if there is an upgarde path from BBL licence to BBP licence?
    Anyone?

    Thanks.

    July 12, 2011 at 8:44 am in reply to: How to sound like radio 7 :) #12163
    DavidMB
    Member

    Thank you very much for your replies.
    I knew Radio 7 used special version of Ocitmax engine years ago, but did not know that they are using BA now. Nice surprise.
    I am familiar with Octimax and also Volume Logic – been folowing software audio processing market and specialy your work Lief for some time now. 🙂

    Well I run a dance web station and we are also using BA Live for a few months now.
    You can listen to it here: http://212.18.63.51:9000/listen.pls
    Very pleased with the way long term listening factor improved sice we implemented it.

    Maybe you guys could listen to it and let me know what you think…

    Best regards, David

    June 27, 2011 at 1:20 pm in reply to: How to sound like radio 7 :) #12159
    DavidMB
    Member

    Hello guys!

    I’d realy like to know if anyone has a suggestiuon on how to tweak BA Live to get a sound that has bass part like stream of radio seven? http://www.radioseven.se

    It looks like all bass energy is focused arround same frequencys – no matter what source audio is processed… and it is tuned perfectly for dance tracks – masive boosted, but in a nice way…

    Thanks for all your suggestions… 🙂

    April 19, 2011 at 7:56 am in reply to: Hardware encoders #11796
    DavidMB
    Member

    [quote author=”JesseG”]I saw marketing-speak and ZERO quantifiable information/specs to back up their (audiotx) claims. Questionable.[/quote]

    Hello!

    We are using 10 pcs. of AudioTx units (STl IP) for STL links via MPLS for 7 years now, and I must say they work excelent. Very stable for 24/7 operation.
    For Tx we use 48kHz 24 bit linear PCM & for Rx 256 kbps mp2 or 128kbps mp3 communication.
    If u open it – yes I did 🙂 – you’ll find a Mini-ITX format PC rununig Linux from CF card & Marian PCI audio card.

    The only downside to this units are fans.
    It has 1 cpu, 1 case & 1 PSU fan. If you run them in a bit hotter enviroment – wich we did in 1 case – then you can expect fan trobules.
    The first one dying was CPU fan – after 2 years of 24/7 operation… anyways – at the end all fans have to be replaced after 5-6 years of non-stop operation…

    BR
    David

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)