Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 390 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Breakaway Hardware Box #11493
    timmywa
    Participant

    [quote author=”Q106″]Any release date on this product??[/quote]
    Good luck!

    in reply to: Breakaway on Win 7 64bit #5265
    timmywa
    Participant

    Hey Joe.

    I am running breakaway AE from my win7 x64 box since about a week ago and have had no issues. Mind you, I’ve reduced win7 down to looking like XP/2000 and have all the extras turned off.

    I’m running it on a p4 HT 3.0ghz with 4gb ram. and running through an audigy 2zx PCI card.

    Never had that problem you mention.

    I imagine this post isn’t directly beneficial, but an instance where it does work.

    Thanks.

    in reply to: ini file for BBP ASIO? #11455
    timmywa
    Participant

    You might find them in C:Users*userfolder*AppDataLocalVirtualStoreProgram Files (x86)

    in reply to: High frequencies and clipper #11349
    timmywa
    Participant

    [quote author=”sneradio”][quote author=”timmywa”]mind sharing the rest of your settings?[/quote]
    All default except
    Power: 65
    Bass boost: +5[/quote]

    Thanks!

    in reply to: High frequencies and clipper #11340
    timmywa
    Participant

    [quote author=”sneradio”][quote author=”Leah Fortescue”]because the highs are just too bright and it gives no way to adjust them.[/quote]
    One reason I settled on using the Reference Classical preset. No apparent boost in the high end.[/quote]

    mind sharing the rest of your settings?

    in reply to: registration limitations? #11293
    timmywa
    Participant

    I think all you’re talking about is good. You can always have one live instance running and registered. It’s not machine specific. You can have a backup that’s not activated (demo mode). But the system will not let you activate any more than one instance or installation at a time.

    Jesse, confirm?

    Thanks.

    in reply to: Free stable alternative to edcast #11093
    timmywa
    Participant

    Nothing for AAC+??

    timmywa
    Participant

    [quote author=”JesseG”][quote author=”timmywa”]Don, use the built-in jitter measurement tool to get your buffer #’s and size down to the lowest size while maintaining under 20% jitter. There’s some posts about this in another thread, I think up in a sticky post. Not sure at the moment.

    You should be able to get it down to 2 buffers each, then just tweak the size until your jitter stabilizes around 10-20% or better.[/quote]

    I don’t recommend doing this if you’re trying to get stable (at all) sound right now. Find out where the problem is, before tossing more wood on the fire. 😉[/quote]

    Yes, listen to Jesse! He is wise.

    timmywa
    Participant

    Don, use the built-in jitter measurement tool to get your buffer #’s and size down to the lowest size while maintaining under 20% jitter. There’s some posts about this in another thread, I think up in a sticky post. Not sure at the moment.

    You should be able to get it down to 2 buffers each, then just tweak the size until your jitter stabilizes around 10-20% or better.

    timmywa
    Participant

    First thing that pops out its the speed. Keep everything at 44100 khz. Check the main config file in edcast to make sure its set to 44100 as well.

    in reply to: Attention world cup fans — vuvuzela filter (VuvuX) #10928
    timmywa
    Participant
    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10960
    timmywa
    Participant

    [quote author=”Audio”]We will amend the jingles levels, but the dilemma we have now is to which level (?) since we have uncompressed musical tracks at all kinds at level as well.

    Upon checking, our jingles are sitting at around 0 dB and so are some of our tracks (say Oasis) but we also have some tracks sitting closer to -10 dB (some Coldplay, Evanescence, etc.).

    So which dB level would you recommend we normalize our complete library to? The reason I am asking is that I am unsure whether bringing up the levels on the -10dB tracks will hurt the audio quality of these tracks? To which level would you recommend we normalize our library to?

    Thanks,

    Audio[/quote]

    Assuming your uncompressed tracks are .WAV, you can find a tool called wavegain ( http://www.rarewares.org/others.php ) and use it to bring all your audio to the same level. I’ve not used wavegain, but it’s partner, mp3gain has a default of -89db. Jesse recommended I lower that to -85db for what would be industry standard. If wavegain is the same, then I would recommend levels like I mentioned. You don’t need to be anywhere near 0db, as you wouldn’t have any headroom.

    Hope that helps.

    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10956
    timmywa
    Participant

    Someone correct me, but what he’s describing sounds like the processor’s AGC is lowering the output during the jingles (ducking) and once the next element comes on that is at a much lower volume, the AGC has to try and bring back the audio to the desired levels. If the processor’s ultimate goal is to provide a consistent sound and your track to track volume is so different, you’ll get that response on all but some of the fastest and loudest presets, like New York or Eruption, etc.

    When I do live shows, I don’t use a mixer so I just amp my mic up quite a bit so that it ducks the music in the background. Sloppy? Yes. But with my available equipment, it does ok. I’ve had to experiment where to set the mic’s volume so that it doesn’t totally obliterate the music so that when I "hit the post" the processor doesn’t have to recover and the opening vocals are still drowned out.

    Hope this helps.

    in reply to: Out of the blue… #10949
    timmywa
    Participant

    Alright boys cuff him! Book him, Dan-o!

    in reply to: Out of the blue… #10947
    timmywa
    Participant

    Dude, Jesse…. You should be arrested for teasing!!! Where’s that pesky download link???

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 390 total)