Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,474 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BBP 0.90.95 skips #10756
    JesseG
    Member

    Hmm yep, then it’s most likely a DPC latency issue… or if it’s not then this would be even more interesting. 🙂

    Can you try DPC Latency Checker on it? It should work on 2003…
    http://www.thesycon.de/deu/latency_check.shtml
    and see how high it spikes after a few minutes of testing.

    in reply to: hardware for Asio #10764
    JesseG
    Member

    You can’t use multiple soundcards with the ASIO version, can you?

    in reply to: Warmer/deeper Bass? #10771
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”mick heaphy”]does the slam not go up to 4? would that not give you more base?.[/quote]
    None of it actually gives more actual bass, it’s just "moving around" the energy that’s already there. Which is why it requires more headroom for the peak levels changing, but should register with exactly the same RMS levels. 8)

    @ Audio
    Bass shape like 20+ & boost up a tad might get you what you want.

    in reply to: OTSAV DJ latency issues #10695
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”winsorpd”]I have Asio4all on my machine[/quote]
    That is just a fake ASIO interface that ultimately uses Kernel Streaming. So all you’re doing is adding more buffers. You’ll get lower latency by just using the Kernel Streaming already built into Breakaway. 😉

    in reply to: BBP 0.90.95 skips #10754
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”X-Hosted”]I noticed that 0.90.95 uses VAC 4.8 and 0.90.77 uses VAC 4.5. But when installing 0.90.95, it also upgrades the VAC. Is there any way of keeping VAC 4.5 and use BBP 0.90.95?[/quote]

    I have the Breakaway Pipeline installed with 1 "cable" for BAE, and I just use the regular VAC v4.9.0.1652 for the exact same reason. If your DPC latency gets nicked up at all, there’s a chance it’ll skip with the Breakaway version and here’s why…

    If you compare the control panels for each, you’ll notice…

    And there-in lies the problem. With the way Breakaway’s Adaptive SRC works, it’s taking care of under & over flows quite gracefully and transparently. VAC is attempting to handle this by just inserting blocks of digital silence, and it’s taking away Breakaway’s chance to do its thing properly. Not good. Leif has known about the problem for some time, and it will be corrected in an upcoming release I’m sure.

    I think that the problem is relatively rare, since it’s dependent on the system having high CPU use and/or way-too-high DPC latency spikes, so… But yes, in those cases perhaps you can use that version of VAC I’m using. It will still have the potential issue with Windows 7 & multi-core CPUs that were fixed in the Breakaway version though, but that’s equally rare from what I remember so chances are one or the other is going to work properly for you.

    in reply to: Love the new website! #10749
    JesseG
    Member

    I know nothing about that, but actually… if he did make that change, I see nothing wrong with it personally because it could help prevent cracking.

    * JesseG waves to the guy that knows that I’m waving at him.

    in reply to: Love the new website! #10747
    JesseG
    Member

    to get Breakaway Broadcast ASIO on there. 😉

    in reply to: Love the new website! #10745
    JesseG
    Member

    If I’m not mistaken, this was all done by Leif’s sister. 8) Only thing I found so far is the "more testimonials" links on the main page goes to a 404 instead of the address that’s in the menu.

    in reply to: Breakaway DJ #9600
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”djscooby”]if i remember correcly the sound touch panel when its pressed it gives "bbbbb" order (i discovered that when i have a notepad open and play with the panel it writes bbbbbbbbbb)[/quote]

    That doesn’t sound right at all. Sounds like the software that handles the key pressings if really screwed up and/or bad design. You could try two things.

    #1 update the software that is handling those key presses
    #2 completely remove the software that is handling those key presses

    in reply to: Breakaway Live 0.90.96 #10428
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”Italofan”]Question, is there a difference in sound (quality) between Breakaway Live and Broadcast, using the Amsterdam preset? I want to use Breakaway for studio monitoring and internet broadcast only[/quote]

    I say Live is higher quality for all but FM/AM/MTX applications… all the way. Sure CLEAN clipping can sometimes allow a bit better subjective quality when the signal is already pushed way too far – such as competitive loudness on the FM dial – but for digital broadcasting it’s undesirable.

    What you want is a cleaner more open and natural sound that is pleasant to listen to, not "impressive" within the first 7 seconds or people might tune out. I say that it’s the exact opposite of that. You want a pleasant tone, with some semblance of musical dynamics left, and to deliver that sound consistently.

    I helped (in many more ways than just processing) a net-radio station leave a 50 listener max setup in a bedroom… become the #1 net-radio network online for 2.5 years running… with what Leif describes as "a really good sounding EQ", aka my own audio processing. (it’s quite a lot more complicated, but what he said has merit even though he doesn’t know its topography) An "impressive" loud processed sound doesn’t impress for long, even in the short term of 1 listening session. What may have initially attracted someone to your station, will eventually turn them off too. But think of it like a shallow relationship. Most of us have had them on one side or another (or both, hehe). What a long lasting healthy relationship with your listeners needs is common ground. Impressing listeners just for the sake of impressing them is going to attract the wrong listeners. It’s all about the content. This is really what makes niche internet radio such a destructive (in a good way) change. The challenge in audio processing with all of this in mind is to allow the content producers the freedom to present whatever they want with a sound pleasing to your listeners, without it getting in the way of the content. "A really good sounding EQ".

    If you learn anything from me, in regards to processing and what the listener wants… soak in what I just said in that last paragraph until it becomes part of your understanding. Coming from the guy that also made the "New York" preset… it’s probably is a bit hard to swallow, but I do know that some people *think* they have to "put up" with the boxes they *think* they are placed in – namely certain top market FM broadcasters. We’re not part of that. We can give the listener what they want without limitations. Pleasantly delivered content that they want.

    Word.

    in reply to: Orange AGC? #10737
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”sgeirk”]When can I mess with this masterpiece???[/quote]
    What Leif’s working on right now is some core methodology to the way he works… more importantly to the way he wants to work, and bringing his code closer to that workflow… so that he can do more with less hassles. Stuff nobody will appreciate or know about directly, as usual for behind the scenes stuff, but none the less a big deal.

    After he gets happy (i hope) with how that turns out, we’ll be looking at some updates after that. So, I guess what I’m saying is that I have no idea when 😛 but what he’s working on now will give Leif more time to code, and hopefully more time to not code. 8) 8) 8)

    in reply to: ASIO Drivers #10740
    JesseG
    Member

    Breakaway comes with a 64bit version of the "Breakaway Pipeline" which is the only driver that comes with Breakaway, and which wouldn’t be used for ASIO access of the audio card anyways. So either way, you’re good to go. 8)

    JesseG
    Member

    those are the main crucial settings.

    adjust the "crossfade when level falls to" so it’s 9dB below whatever your usual mix levels are, if you’re not playing songs that are cranked to 0dB. if you are, then i recommend using ReplayGain.
    http://stashbox.org/897987/05162010-202 … rences.png
    this will use the default recommended ReplayGain target level of 89dB. so with that you would probably want a "level falls to" setting around -15dB ish but don’t quote me on it, I haven’t tested that but that’s about where it would make sense to me. you’ll also have to scan all of your tracks (select all in playlist, right click, send to -> calculate replaygain) and "save track data" when it’s done. PERSONALLY i would instead use Foobar2000 to insert ReplayGain tags into all of your mp3s, flacs, etc. It can insert ReplayGain into both ID3v2 and APEv2 tags, so you get a complete coverage of the methods used… although APEv2 is really the standard method used by virtually all of the supporting players.

    adjust Crossfade fade-out curve to taste.

    also increase the "don’t crossfade tracks smaller than" setting to about 75 seconds, if you’re playing 60 second commercials too.

    in reply to: Orange AGC? #10733
    JesseG
    Member

    Those are wideband compressors. They can be used by the preset designer to allow the AGC and/or multiband attack to be slower, but still control sudden loudness bursts with very little to basically inaudible action if they are well tuned.

    Yellow = AGC
    Orange = Wideband 1 (between AGC and multiband)
    Dark Orange = Wideband 2 (can be before or after the multiband, depends on preset)

    With the next Breakaway updates, you’ll get my new "Passive Aggressor" preset which makes the most use of these yet… pushing it to the limit on quite a lot of content. It allows the rest of the processing to be very relaxed.

    What also helped a lot with that preset is the "Inf:1 above threshold" feature (it doesn’t have a proper name yet). This preset makes the most use of the "Inf:1 above" feature than any other preset. The effect on the dynamics from this is similar to Omnia.11’s new Chameleon density-adaptive acceleration feature.

    For certain reasons the "Inf:1 above" thing works best on slower multiband settings, so Chameleon certainly has the 1UP on "Inf:1 above" when it comes to density-adaptive effects as far as attack/sustain. With sustain/release, Breakaway has something similar ("Progressive Release") but works more with peak information than density… and there are times that it can work against the goals of loud yet clear processing. This is mainly true of very fast multiband settings that also make heavy use of this feature. A method to limit the effect of that based on density would be dope. Congrats to CG for being dope. 8)

    p.s. sorry to go off on such a tangent, but it was fun

    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”George”]Except this major problem for ASIO mode[/quote]
    You’re addressing the wrong issue though since ASIO probably can’t perform the routing he’s talking about no matter how good or not so good it works.

    mattysouthall, have you tried recording from "mix" in the driver’s control panel where you set what you’re recording from?

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,474 total)