Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 281 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Server setup & Soundcard #10079
    yorkie98
    Participant

    Pipelines will work fine in stationplaylist so pipeline 1 is the locical choice for the input and pipeline 2 for the output to your encoder. Livelink I think is needed more for SAM broadcaster, livelink may work but is not needed.

    AFAIK, Server 2003 is fine.

    in reply to: Server setup & Soundcard #10077
    yorkie98
    Participant

    Sometimes I don’t always read through a message properly, I totally missed that you were setting up a web radio station…
    So, ignore pretty much everything I advised, and take the advice from AdamH.

    in reply to: Don’t Tell the Kids #10086
    yorkie98
    Participant

    Well I for one am going to start breeding and eating rabbits thenks to the great advice given here.
    Maybe I’m a little too easily taken in??

    in reply to: Server setup & Soundcard #10075
    yorkie98
    Participant

    The very best soundcard for BBP (nothing else comes close) is a Marian Trace Alpha. This however is not a multi I/O soundcard so you will need to either add a second normal soundcard for your editing/mixing or use the onboard one.
    The machine spec you have quoted should easily cope with BBP and Stationplaylist in fact you’ll probably only use about 10% cpu on that.
    A BBP machine does not actually need to be a server, its just recommended to build a server grade machine for the job so running Idrac is not needed unless you are running this for your own purposes.

    Hope this helps.

    Yorkie.

    in reply to: Motor City 69 Teaser #10028
    yorkie98
    Participant

    I figured it might be the source as the preset and all the other tracks sounded superb.

    You should take a listen to the SACD if you get a chance, its so clean and smooth and the 5.1 mix makes it possible to hear elements of the music you never notice before as they were lost in the mix.

    in reply to: Motor City 69 Teaser #10026
    yorkie98
    Participant

    Jesse, Loving this preset so far, it’s powerful yet open, and respectful of the dynamics. It’s also really bright and crisp, kick drums keep their edge and don’t lose their attack.

    The only track which IMO did not sound as good as I hoped was the Great Gig in the Sky, although this may be down to the source as my reference for this track is the 2003 remaster SACD.
    It’s just the piano seems to develop a gritty, almost 8-bit sound during the quieter periods (this may be gating noise in the orignal master) but I certainly don’t hear this on my SACD version.
    Aside from this observation (which may be down to the source anyway) the dynamics were handled brilliantly and the feel and emotion of the song shone through.

    A great job so far, keep up the great work.

    Yorkie.

    in reply to: New system – scaling/hardware questions #10073
    yorkie98
    Participant

    Rackmount PC cases are not hard to obtain, you’ll typically need a 4U case to accomodate a PCI card vertically (without risers etc..).
    With regards to the Processor/Motherboard/Ram/HD etc, that’s really all down to budget and how far you can afford to go.
    The Ultimate machine (which I have never and probably never will build) would be a quad core processor in a real decent motherboard, I like MSI or gigabyte boards myself but there are plenty of reviews going for any board, just do your research. You’d use a Solid state hard drive and install a nice slim install of XP Pro SP3. You’d also have plenty of cooling in there to keep all the parts content. Soundcard wise you would use a Marian Trace Alpha, there is NO better card for BBP.

    In reality, most of the systems are build to a budget (and leaving as much margin in there for myself as well) and the exact parts I use are often dictated by what’s available at the supplier.

    With regards to your Juli@ card (if you havent bought it yet, do STRONGLY consider a Marian Trace Alpha, you will be so glad you did), the AM input, although mono would still be fed into one stereo pair of the card (just in mono) and the FM audio would be going into the second. This is assuming that these are two seperate stations or audio feeds and not simply a simulcast on FM and AM, if it’s a simulcast, then you only need to connect the audio once and both instances can pick up the audio from the same input, BBP can then be switched (digitally) to sum the L/R audio for the AM instance and use the same audio for the FM instance, this time not summing the input thus keeping it stereo.

    The outputs of each instance can either be sent to seperate outputs on the soundcard (if available) or can even be set so that the FM instance sends its MPX signal out of (for example) the left channel and the AM instance sends it’s mono output out on the right channel. This configuration would work equally well on a multi-output card or a single output card as we are able to split the L and R of the card and each channel can carry an independant output, this can even be used to process and output two totally different stations on the one single output soundcard.

    Yorkie.

    in reply to: Demo setup for AM #10053
    yorkie98
    Participant

    [quote author=”JesseG”]AM does use pre-emphasis.

    and the NTSC spec for AM allows for 10kHz of audio bandwidth. no reason to limit it to 5kHz unless you WANT to sound worse.

    And no soundcard is ever "overkill" for anything, unless you’re talking about a 13 year old kid playing games or something. This is broadcast baby.[/quote]

    True comment Jesse about the soundcard, I’m just such a skinflint at times, always looking for that economy/quality sweetspot. I’ll take my hat off to the first person who uses a Trace Alpha for AM..

    My setup was for the European AM specification where I live in the UK, the audio bandwidth is 40hz -5khz.

    So, Robert, set the HPF and LPF filters accordingly for your territory/license. As for the pre-emphasis, again, none used here in Eurozone AFAIK but if appropriate for your territory then of course set to required time constant.

    in reply to: New system – scaling/hardware questions #10071
    yorkie98
    Participant

    quote :

    I’m no expert when it comes to multiprocessing, but am I safe to assume that the machine I dug up this afternoon – a DL380 with dual 2.8GHz P4’s and 1GB of RAM – should be able to handle the load of two BBP instances configured as above?

    I’d never assume anything, the only way to know is to try it. In my opinion 90% continuous CPU load is too high for a continuous operation, it will only result in severly shortened system lifespan. I make systems for BBP and even using the modern Dual-core Celerons (E1500 or E3300 for example), get about 35% CPU useage with a single instance. Using even a low end non-celeron dual core (such as an E5300 or E5400) brings this down to around 25%, much more comfortable for my tastes.
    1Gb of ram should be adequate (although I always build with 2Gb, as windows get more and more bloated with every update). BBP has quite a low memory footprint of around 140Mb (per instance), considering what it does.

    quote :

    For obvious reasons, I’m also pretty much set on getting a new sound card for this project. I’ve checked out the Juli@ boards, and it seems that one of them would satisfy my needs – I need 3 in and 3 out, they do 4×4. Would this be a good bet for my situation?

    It should be ok, but please explain in more detail what each of the 3 outs are intended to be for.

    quote :

    On a related note, I’m also looking forward to testing BBP ASIO once I get my hands on some “real” audio hardware (the AM is automated and thus not very latency-sensitive, but the FM is live and I’d prefer to have the talent monitor off-air if possible). Would it be advisable, or even possible, to run BBP ASIO on the setup I’ve described? How much latency might I expect in such a scenario?

    For the same reasons outlined above, you would need a better spec of machine to run this than you 2×2.8Ghz box, especially the ASIO version as this will place more demands upon the system and be a great deal less forgiving in the event of any kind of underruns. Exact minimum and recommecnded system specs are published on the main website.

    I believe the latency can be as low as 17ms (from memory) but lower latency is always to the cost of quality to a certain degree.

    Hope this helps,

    Yorkie

    in reply to: Demo setup for AM #10051
    yorkie98
    Participant

    All settings apply to the latest (.93) version..
    To begin with, if you are using AM, you will need to de-select Stereo in the settings section. Secondly, you will not need pre-emphasis selected either (put down to 15us).
    In the calibration screen, I would first of all apply the bandwidth to 5Khz, and the HPF to 30Hz, which it will be on anyway.
    In the I/O config screen, Disable the RDS in if not already done and disable the main output (this will bring up the AM sub-menu when you go back into the calibration menu) and then set the L/R output as your main output card. This will then give you an AM compliant mono output. Go back to the calibration menu and adjust the AM asymmetry slider to the desired level (25% for 125% positive peaks). The difference will not be immediately obvious visually but if you (temporarily) put the final drive right to the top and then adjust the asymmetry slider up, you will see the bottom of the trace lifting upwards, this is your visual confirmation that BBP is now producing positive peaks.

    The preset/audio settings you use are entirely down to your own taste and requirements, try a few and play with the sliders until you get a sound you like.
    I’m not sure (maybe someone can help here) if the Tilt calibration is required for AM, I’m kinda guessing not but I could well be wrong here, CMIIW people..

    Finally, unless you are using the E-Mu 1212 for a specific quality reason, this is major overkill for AM, the 192Khz operation is only required for FM stereo operation. ANY soundcard will be fine for AM, even an onboard card will give a more than good enough SNR for AM.

    Hope this helps,

    Yorkie.

    in reply to: My LPFM Build In Washington State KAPY 95.5 #10021
    yorkie98
    Participant

    [quote author=”just passing thru”]Yorkie,
    Thanks for the great response, that has answered my questions . Now I will focus on getting, the Juli@ soundcard TO START, since I can use it down the rd with my automation computer, which will input into computer #2, which will utilize BBP. I will need to make/buy a jumper that is a 1/8 stereo jack to BNC, which is the MPX input on my Energy-Onix.
    EDIT: After talk with my consultant, he has instructed me to ask the following question.
    Does BBP generate a stereo sub-carrier and if so how does it take the place of a stereo generator?
    Are you in the states?
    Guy[/quote]

    Hi Guy, yes, Breakaway (Broadcast) does generate a stereo subcarrier and it does totally take the place of a traditional hardware generator. It takes the place of a hardware stereo generator by fulfilling exactly the same function, in the same way that an automation playout PC replaces a hardware CD player, or a PC can be used instead of a pocket calculator, a typewriter or a DVD player etc… etc..

    I am not in the US, I am in the UK.

    in reply to: My LPFM Build In Washington State KAPY 95.5 #10013
    yorkie98
    Participant

    Hi,
    Ok for a start, you will not need the Behringer 1202 at all. Here is how you should configure your setup..

    To begin with your computer upon which you have Breakaway installed, MUST be capable of 192Khz operation. The very best soundcard to use is a Marian Trace Alpha. If you can’t source one of these then I recommend an ESI Juli@ which are easy to source. For ease, I shall refer to the Juli@ card but if you get a Trace alpha then replace each reference as appropriate.

    If your playout is on the same PC as you are running breakaway, you will need to set the Zara output to "Breakaway Pipeline 1".
    If your playout is on a different computer and/or you have a mixer in your setup, the audio from this must be connected to the input of the Juli@ card.
    This is where the magic begins.. The computer with breakaway running, not only processes your sound above and beyond industry standards, but it also acts as your stereo coder (and optionally RBDS/RDS coder if you plugin the Airomate software for €25).
    You then connect the output of just one channel of the Juli@ card into your exciter (remember this is now a multiplexed signal). You will now be transmitting in stereo with fully processed audio.

    You should think of the computer running Breakaway with the Juli@ (or Trace Alpha) card fitted as the equivalent of an Orban Optimod 8500 (only better). You connect L/R stereo audio into it and you get fully processed and multiplexed (transmitter ready) audio out. It almost sounds too good to be true I know but this is how advanced Breakaway is as a product.
    It’s best to have the breakaway PC doing this job standalone but it should be ok to run a basic automation system such as Zara on the same machine if you wish or if you need to.

    To answer your question "Is there a software based stereo generator that I can utilize?" the answer is YES, Breakaway has this built in. There are a handful of other programs which can do this also but Breakaway stands head and shoulders above all of them as the only professional quality processor AND stereo coder out there.
    The most important thing to understand is that you must have a 192Khz output soundcard (most standard PC soundcards are 48Khz). Without this, none of this is possible.

    I hope this helps.

    Yorkie.

    in reply to: USING TC FINALIZER EXPRESS BEFORE BREAKAWAY #9987
    yorkie98
    Participant

    [quote author=”josefzamm”]Hi Guys,

    Thanks for your replies.
    So what do you suggest then should I go directly from my "On Air" Mixer to the Breakaway Broadcast with nothing in between?

    Regards
    jos.[/quote]

    Yep, thats totally the best way, just make sure you dont go in too hot. you can give BBP quite a low level even -12 to -20dB is fine, this will give you plenty of headroom for shouty DJs, (watch your SNR tho) and BBP takes care of the rest.

    in reply to: 1 card 2 instances & advanced config #9997
    yorkie98
    Participant

    [quote author=”rebel”]re split processing on the AAC+ link, after looking at the issue further, I understand it may also be desirable to set the processing at the studio to include the AGC & MBL compression stages only (and perhaps light peak protection limiting, but no clipping), while the tx end will have the limiting & clipping sections. The theory is that if tonal rebalancing of the MBL section occurs only at the transmitter end, that it may uncover some of link noise previously masked by the link codec. In this case, it may only be possible to use BBP (at both ends of the link) if we have more advanced control, or at least the ability to disable some processing modules.[/quote]


    @Rebel
    /Aaron… I in fact use BBP in a similar way, I have a main site, close to the studio which is fed by a 320Kbps unprocessed IP STL (running about -20dB below threshold to give ample headroom), this is then fed into BBP and into the transmitter. The L/R feed (via dsp) is fed into Edcast (a 3dB attenuator is applied in dsp before edcast as a public AAC+ stream is also created by edcast) and a private 160Kbps MP3 stream is sent to a streaming host. This stream contains the processing of the AGC and the MBL but the effect of the final clippers is somewhat lost due to encoding/decoding artifacts, meaning the potential for overshoots is re-introduced. This stream is then cascaded to remote transmitter sites where the stream audio is fed into BBP but the preset selected is "6dB protection clip". This effectively does not utilise the AGC or MBL but just feeds straight into the final clippers. The resulting MPX signal is then fed to the transmitters.

    If you are using AAC+ for your link and this is ONLY for your link, not used as a webstream too, then I would tend to try to run this with no processing at all, you will get a better end result as a heavily processed signal is harder to encode into a limited kbps stream than unprocessed music as there is simply less detail and information there to squeeze in. Then let BBP do ALL the work at the TX end which is what it does best.

    To my ears, all the transmitters sound tonally identical, there are no overshoots on any site and +/-75khz nailed up all the time. The only way anyone would notice these are IP fed is that the main site is approx 20 secs ahead of all the remote sites, but I’m hoping to address that sometime by introducing a delay to the mpx output to the main transmitter to bring them to within 1 sec of each other.

    in reply to: 1 card 2 instances & advanced config #9990
    yorkie98
    Participant

    I can help with some of this…

    quote :

    1/ I’ll get the stupid question out the way first! I’ve seen in the forum screen shots of the Challanger stereo enhancer, but how do I load it and bring up the interface?

    To enable the Challenger, Stereo Enhancer, go to the I/O settings menu, enable effects. Then go back to the signal settings menu and you will now see that the effect plugins section is enabled. click edit, you will find that the enhancer is already loaded here, you simply need to tick enable to bring into life.

    quote :

    2/ I see forum references to future planned versions of BBP with greater processing control options. When do you plan to release that, will it be a downloadable upgrade (paid or complimentary?) to BBP, and what extent of controls do you intend to offer? How will this likely differ from any hardware BBP processors planned?

    When updates/fixes/enhancements are released they are released here in Beta form in the sticky at the top of this forum. For example, the release you download from the website is 0.90.77 whereas on the forum you can get 0.90.93 but this AFAIK is still Beta.

    quote :

    B) It seems the BBP range control effects both AGC and multiband. I’d ideally like to control the AGC drive separately, as in one chain for our main tx site we will have a linear 24 bit IP STL, which I intend to run (unprocessed, unprotected) at a nominal level of -30dbfs at the studio’s, to allow plenty of headroom for the crazy things some announcers do! At the transmitter site, I need the BBP AGC range to be able to deal with that.

    The range control does also affect the MBL as well as the AGC, This will allow the AGC to cope with the range you desire but may well overcook the MBL. I have long been asking for seperate AGC/MBL sliders too but this may come in time and it may not.

    quote :

    In another chain to our smaller regional sites, we have STL’s using 64kbps AAC+ coding based on Orban 1100/1010PE encoders. In a split architecture with lossy low bit rate codecs, Orban suggest its desirable to have the pre link processing operate only with AGC and peak protection limiting (which rarely comes into play). In this case, I would need to disable (or mainly disable) the AGC in BBP at the transmitter site.

    For this useage, I would personally use no ACG pre- link just some light peak protection then allow BBP to do all the hard work at the transmitter site. If not possible, then if your original signal has an agc already applied, the AGC on BBP will have little or no work to do so won’t maffect your audio negatively as it will just pretty much sit at it’s arbitrary level, satisfied that the audio gain is ok.

    quote :

    4/ I’m looking at running two instances of BBP or BBP ASIO on a pc. Preferably BBP as I’d still prefer dealing with longer latency and have better quality processing. What I’d like to do is allow one sound card to provide the MPX output for both instances. For example, a pc with a single Juli@ card installed, BBP instance one feeding the Julia left analog ouput, BBP instance two feeding the Julia right analog output. Is this possible in either BBP/BBP ASIO?

    This useage is possible due to an upgrade I requested a little while back. In the I/O menu set the output to your Juli@ card but in the channel selection, select 2(L) and in the other instance, do the same but select channel 2(R). Each instance will now use just one channel of the soundcard and each physical channel of the soundcard will now carry the two different processings or stations.
    This feature is only available on the alpha versions on this forum and not currently in the production version.

    Hope this helps, the other questions Leif may have to answer himself.

    Yorkie98

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 281 total)