Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Suggestions for classic hits/new music hybrid station #12895
    Don935
    Member

    On a lark, I tried using Jill FM for about a hour, but I’m back with Rustonium, speed at 40. It has the presence I want but isn’t as fatiguing to my ears as Jill.

    in reply to: Suggestions for classic hits/new music hybrid station #12893
    Don935
    Member

    That’s the flash player I’m using, all right. 😀

    in reply to: Suggestions for classic hits/new music hybrid station #12889
    Don935
    Member

    I’ve tried this since this morning and listened to several hours, and it’s sounding great to me. Thanks for the suggestion, Timmywa. Would you mind listening to the stream for a bit when you have time?

    http://65.49.77.146:9060

    in reply to: Suggestions for classic hits/new music hybrid station #12887
    Don935
    Member

    I’m aware of that; I’m just wondering, in the board’s opinion, what would be the best starting point.

    My music mix covers songs from the early 70’s to the present. It’s mostly pop and rock, but there’s also urban, alternative, triple-A and even the rare country crossover. That’s a lot of recording styles and dynamics are going to vary, especially comparing an older song with the overprocessed mishmash that’s put out today. What I’m looking for is the "happy medium" that will make if not all, most if it, sound good. Plutonium is very, very close, but I’m still not totally happy with it.

    in reply to: Suggestions for classic hits/new music hybrid station #12885
    Don935
    Member

    If the range is set to 50, what does that translate to as a ratio? Is it the same for each preset? Does a higher range value equal higher compression? I know that’s a lot of questions, but I really don’t know the answers. The more I know, the better I can fine-tune Live for the sound I want.

    in reply to: ITU Input Ref Level #12877
    Don935
    Member

    I’d wondered what that was too. Thanks for the info! 😀

    in reply to: compliments to the chef #11321
    Don935
    Member

    Well, my compliments to you, sgerik. I’ve tried out your presets on my station for the last couple of hours, and it sounds amazing. I think I have a keeper here.

    Don935
    Member

    The problem seems to be solved. The critical time period passed with no breakup! :mrgreen: I believe it might have been a combination of properly setting the sample rate in Live and enlarging the buffer size in SPL. In any case, everything is smooooth now. Thanks, folks.

    One more thing…if you folks have a moment, could you check the stream and see how it’s sounding to you? I’m using a tweaked Plutonium and it sounds good to me, but another set of ears is always helpful.

    http://www.loudcity.com/stations/project-42/tune_in

    Don935
    Member

    [quote author=”JesseG”]SRC should absolutely be checked.[/quote]

    Done. It was anyway; just wanted to be sure. You’ve all been great so far. Thanks for the comments!

    Don935
    Member

    Well, then if I’m using Live as the virtual soundcard, it should be unchecked, then?

    Ross Levis of SPL says the output sound device controls the speed, which in my case is Live. SPL Studio (the playout software) uses Direct Sound for all audio output. Ross has suggested increasing the output buffer in SPL (it’s currently set at 500 ms), so I’ll at least double that, and take it from there.

    Don935
    Member

    I shall do that. 😀

    By the way: if I am not using a sound card at all, should SRC be checked?

    Don935
    Member

    JesseG: Good idea; I’ll ask Ross on the SPL forums and update here when I get an answer.

    Timmywa: I switched pipeline 2 to 44100; the edcast encoders are already set there. Thanks.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)