Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 70 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Preset Request… #11176
    Audio
    Member

    Wow! I second this post a 100%, I could have written it myself as I am encountering the exact same problem for this format! It’s actually driving me nuts! :mrgreen:

    Cheers!

    in reply to: Sound search… #11107
    Audio
    Member

    [quote author=”JesseG”]the Anawida graphical EQs are purposely analog style, and so are not linear-phase either[/quote]

    Oh! Thanks for pointing this out we wouldn’t want to wreck it all… 8)

    Well for linear-phase EQs… Wave has one as part of its Master bundle and Algorithmix sells one for around €1’000!!! 😯

    Audio

    in reply to: Sound search… #11105
    Audio
    Member

    Alright, thanks Jesse!

    You are right setting the Output to Breakaway Pipeline 1 does the trick…. 🙄

    The PEQ settings are indeed helpful. Though they take a while to getting used to, especially the width part…

    I was wondering however, what do you think of the Anwida 31 Band EQ vst plugin? Has anyone tried it to satisfaction?

    Thanks!

    Audio

    in reply to: Sound search… #11102
    Audio
    Member

    Yep, we are using the efx-bass plugin.

    Unfortunately, since we are using Livelink and have no sound card (output is disabled in I/O Configuration) we have no way of checking or unchecking L/R Out De-emphasis (not sure which is the default) or to use the L/R PEQ controls… (See attached print screen).

    A couple of questions:

    1) Is there a way to force these De-emphasis and PEQ controls without having a sound card?

    2) Would anyone know of a reliable equalizer effect plug-in we could add to BBP’s audio chain?

    3) In Edcast’s configuration file (dsp_edcast_v3_1.cfg) is there a way to alter (reduce) the midrange or highs?

    Thanks,

    Audio

    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10970
    Audio
    Member

    [quote author=”RodeoJack”]My music tracks top out at about -6 with my jingles hitting -3 or so. I try to stay away from 0. Riding a song down at -10 can be difficult for any processor… especially if you randomize your selections.[/quote]

    Rodeojack,

    I have been wondering about your music tracks levels / jingles levels… How did you come to this conclusion as you mentioned it would be beneficial to have slightly higher levels at the start of a new cue… I am assuming that having equal levels on both the jingles and the music tracks would do the trick when applying a small fade prior to the segue point.

    In any cases I have now managed to lower our jingles to around -4 dB using Wavegain and it seems to work much better this way! 🙂

    We still have some problems on some music tracks being either too close to -1 dB or -10 dB. So we want to alter these via wavegain as well but are now wondering whether we should get at the same level as the jingles or replicate something along the line of what you’ve done.

    Thanks,

    Audio

    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10969
    Audio
    Member

    [quote author=”JesseG”]start by reading the manual. =)[/quote]
    I’ll try that.. 😉
    Thanks

    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10967
    Audio
    Member

    [quote author=”JesseG”]i recommended 85 dB because it’s between the two, but more on the side of 83dB. Tim, what percentage of songs would you say actually get turned up at 85dB?[/quote]

    Hi Jesse,

    Thanks for the recommendation. I am looking at this today, using dBpoweramp and its useful DSPs, including replaygain:

    – Convert file to 32 float
    – Apply Replaygain, though they offer two desired volume settings for "active" and "inactive" ReplayGain: between 0 and -40dB??? what settings would you recommend here?
    – Convert back to 16 bits

    How does this sound? Do you think our uncompressed wav files will survive this? 🙂

    Thanks,

    Audio

    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10962
    Audio
    Member

    [quote author=”timmywa”]Assuming your uncompressed tracks are .WAV, you can find a tool called wavegain ( http://www.rarewares.org/others.php ) and use it to bring all your audio to the same level. I’ve not used wavegain, but it’s partner, mp3gain has a default of -89db. Jesse recommended I lower that to -85db for what would be industry standard. If wavegain is the same, then I would recommend levels like I mentioned. You don’t need to be anywhere near 0db, as you wouldn’t have any headroom.

    Hope that helps.[/quote]

    Thanks Timmy, that should help a great deal, I’ll look into it 🙂

    Audio

    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10961
    Audio
    Member

    [quote author=”jameskuzman”]In your initial post, you mention the problem when transitioning from a jingle to a song, but you didn’t say you were having a problem between two songs. [/quote]

    Jim,
    I actually only noticed the different songs level looking into this matter earlier today, but the problem is indeed with "loud" jingles preceding "lower level" songs. And since we play a jingle between each song, that’s the problem! What the different songs’ level does explain though is why this "ducking" is not taking place in each instances.

    You are making a good point regarding the jingles’ RMS power values, I will have to dig into this a bit more and test different settings against some low level songs. You are correct BBP is able to cope with the different songs level quite well, usually.

    I can not help thinking however that bringing all audio to similar levels would smooth things out.

    Audio

    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10958
    Audio
    Member

    We will amend the jingles levels, but the dilemma we have now is to which level (?) since we have uncompressed musical tracks at all kinds at level as well.

    Upon checking, our jingles are sitting at around 0 dB and so are some of our tracks (say Oasis) but we also have some tracks sitting closer to -10 dB (some Coldplay, Evanescence, etc.).

    So which dB level would you recommend we normalize our complete library to? The reason I am asking is that I am unsure whether bringing up the levels on the -10dB tracks will hurt the audio quality of these tracks? To which level would you recommend we normalize our library to?

    Thanks,

    Audio

    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10955
    Audio
    Member

    [quote author=”RodeoJack”]Just an addition to what Jesse’s already contributed here:
    This is a nifty trick, which works well in a live studio environment. It can also be done with automation, though you have to plan your system carefully to pull it off well.[/quote]

    Thanks for the input! Very interesting indeed!

    We are running mostly in an automated mode. How would you set this for automation? Would it be sufficient to set SPL to operate a light fade before the mix point or would we have to prep our wav files in some ways?

    Thanks

    Audio

    in reply to: Full On Cues? #10953
    Audio
    Member

    Thanks Jesse!

    I had a further look at various music tracks and jingles earlier and noticed that peak amplitudes are all over the place, anywhere between 0 dB and -10 dB… Since we are going to be normalizing everything to the same level, what would you say would be the ideal level to use ahead of BBP?

    Regarding quality, you mentioned converting everything to 32 bits ahead of the normalization, which software would you recommend for us to do so?

    Thanks again!

    Audio

    in reply to: Warmer/deeper Bass? #10772
    Audio
    Member

    Thanks Jesse,

    I shall try that 🙂

    Audio

    in reply to: Warmer/deeper Bass? #10768
    Audio
    Member

    I actually have the bass FX plugin in the plugin chain, it is set at 3 and follows the slam/clunk plugin set respectively at 1 and 2. You are right in theory the Bass FX should provide a nice / prolongued type of bass response…

    I still find that our stream lacks depth as a result of a "punch only" type of bass.
    I get the feeling I should take the bass shape button in negative territory though our primary audience will find itsef behind a computer / small speakers. Does this make sense or should I stick to normal 0?

    in reply to: Passive Aggressor (yeah, more teasing) #10490
    Audio
    Member

    Wow, this is pretty impressive… though we could never get it that clean over a 128k mp3 stream.

    In which way would you say the Passive Aggressor differs from Rustonium?

    Are you planning a tease on some "muddy" Rock tracks?

    I’m looking forward to seeing this Passive Aggressor on the next release 🙂

    Audio

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 70 total)