Home › Forums › Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued] › New Vorsis Air Aura Proccesor
- This topic has 11 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by Q106.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 15, 2010 at 4:50 pm #779camcloneMember
Did you see this magic box ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xklMqInK … re=related
any comments? is it …a distortion box or ..not ?
wow! what a Graphic Interface!! 🙂)
April 15, 2010 at 5:52 pm #10497JesseGMemberIf there’s any one thing I can say about Vorsis… It’s that they are selling an idea.
April 15, 2010 at 5:59 pm #10498jameskuzmanMemberI’ll preface my remarks by saying that I have never knowingly heard a Vorsis processor and have never used one. I’ll also add that one of the most impressive sounding stations I’d heard up to that point "back in the day" was the old B-105 in Orlando when Jeff Keith was at the audio helm.
That said, 31 bands of limiting and/or clipping sounds (no pun intended) – at least in theory – like trouble just waiting to happen. That’s a whole lotta filters, and a whole lotta stuff to re-combine and control.
I think we all understand the benefits of multi-band dynamics control, but after 5, 6, or maybe 7 bands, what’s really to be gained? Is there a need for additional bands?
We’ve all heard very respectable processors, capable of sounding wonderful, turn into audio disasters in the wrong hands. You can go very, very wrong on the air with an 8500 or Omnia6 (the latter perhaps more than the former) if you don’t know what you’re doing or simply have – shall we say – questionable ears or tastes.
Again, I’m not criticizing the Vorsis in any way, but I question the need and wisdom of providing 31 bands of dynamics control.
If I’m missing something, I’m open-minded and all ears to anyone else’s input.
Jim
April 15, 2010 at 6:49 pm #10499jameskuzmanMember[quote author=”JesseG”]If there’s any one thing I can say about Vorsis… It’s that they are selling an idea.[/quote]
Which is… "If 6 bands are good, 31 must be five times as good"? 🙂
April 16, 2010 at 1:58 pm #10500jameskuzmanMemberWhen I read Frank’s description of where things at Omnia were going vision-wise on their website, I was really encouraged.
To my ear, the Omnia line has always been very capable of high-quality FM audio (within the confines of the medium of course) if used "properly." I like that he’s focusing on turning the attention back to quality.
One of the most intriguing elements is the real-time study of the "texture" of the audio going in (ie: clipped and overcompressed source material) and processing decisions made based upon that information. I can’t wait to hear one…
Jim
April 16, 2010 at 3:56 pm #10501camcloneMemberI T O T A L Y AGREE with you dudes!
Omnia , Breakaway and Stereotool are the only tools for a long long listening experience.
BUT , you must know how to configure them.thanks for the conversation!
September 13, 2010 at 3:09 pm #10502Q106Memberhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g4u6mrq … r_embedded
New unit selling VERY well.Jeff was Foti’s right hand man at Omnia before going to Vorsis.He knows a thing or two about processing.Mike Erickson from CBS FM joins the Vorsis team.Serious high end players need to test drive this box.It is a game changer.
September 13, 2010 at 5:13 pm #10503camcloneMemberWow ! Very interesting presentation!
I think that 2010 was the year where " broadcast sound processors " became " sound artificial intelligence " .
something like a sound proccess robot 🙂
( latest versions of omnia, vorsis, breakaway, stereotool e.t.c. )
They are not just an…attack …release like the old old days.. 🙂
Things are changing,
not only attack release but… Psychoacoustic proccess 🙂)
September 13, 2010 at 11:59 pm #10504JesseGMemberIt would be nice to hear a well tuned Vorsis AP2000 and/or Air setup… on the Torture Test. MPX output please. There really isn’t any other way to accurately compare the output of different processors.
The AP2000 clip from Processing Freak Day in Netherlands is basically a joke, as the salepeople and whatever tech they sent (if they sent one) were fussing with the box trying to "beat" Breakaway by switching presets etc… and the box they had clearly had problems with its mono detection algorithms.
mpxtool.com if anyone wants to upload it. 😉
September 14, 2010 at 1:57 am #10505Q106MemberNext torture test should be:
1.Vorsis Air Aura
2. Orban 8600 in the Play School Box
3. Omnia 11
4. What Leif’s new offering (hardware box) will be called.That would be interesting to hear…
What cha think?September 14, 2010 at 3:26 am #10506JesseGMemberWhat I think is of course that should be done. Simple fact tho, is even comparing that way, you’re just comparing specific settings in each of the boxes, and it’s the manufacturers that don’t want to play that game. Some maybe don’t want to compete on fair ground too, but the 1st "issue" makes for a convenient excuse.
Leif has given away MPX Tool licenses to manufacturers before who said they would submit their own MPX of the Torture Test, and they never actually did send anything in return. 😐
It’ll most likely have to be done by someone who owns one of those.
September 14, 2010 at 2:27 pm #10507Q106MemberTrue.It’s a crap shoot at best,just like Arbitron ratings.I got credit for one diary from a plant that plays us overhead with 300 employees.Nice and loud,too.So to me that should be 300 diaries.ARB is so full of crap.I think each box should be setup with sample songs.Get the best tweak you can and then compare. I don’t know anyone running impact on an 8500.Way over the top for me.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued]’ is closed to new topics and replies.