Home Forums Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued] Let’s …over-modulate…using high frequencies only!! :)

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #231
    camclone
    Member

    Leif,
    Can you please share with us the best parametric EQ settings for ..overmodulating WITHOUT losing the stability of the exciter and losing the "lock" of our radio frequency in some recievers?
    Maiby by raising by some way the high frequencies…and creating some nice..overshoots at highs ?
    can you give me 2 methods for medium overmodulation and high overmodulation ?
    using Breakaway broadcast MPX parametric EQ maiby ?

    anyone else have good settings for overmodulation without losing the lock PLL ?

    #6534
    Leif
    Keymaster

    LOL 🙂

    Interesting request, Camclone!

    The fact that you want to overmodulate while not losing lock, tells me you’re looking to be louder.

    The PEQ is not the right tool to use then — just use the MPX level control, either in BBP or the transmitter. This way you can achieve consistent, controlled overmodulation. 😉

    Be warned though — while some tuners can handle overmodulation, others cannot! It will depend on the IF filter in the tuner. Thus, you may be "impossibly" loud and clean in one tuner, and sound horrendously distorted in another.

    It also causes interference to other stations, and it’s also just plain illegal. I wouldn’t recommend it — there’s really nothing to gain.

    ///Leif

    #6535
    Lee XS
    Member

    Speaking of the PEQ Leif, I recall from another forum that you have tried and tested, the M-Audio 192, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS (PCI) and the ASUS P5KPL-AM On-Board card.

    As I have all 3 of these, is there any chance you could post the PEQ settings and the Tilt settings so people who have these cards can get the most out of BBP??

    Regards

    #6536
    Leif
    Keymaster

    I can measure and post the SB Audigy 2 and the ASUS P5KPL On-Board settings. I can’t do the M-Audio — I modified the card with bigger capacitors to remove the tilt in hardware, so it’s not stock anymore 😉.

    ///Leif

    #6537
    JesseG
    Member

    And remember that only compensates for the card. If your exciter/transmitter has tilt, you’ll also need to adjust the tilt correction with those in mind (with accurate monitoring of course, like mpxtool)

    #6538
    Lee XS
    Member

    [quote author=”Leif”]I can measure and post the SB Audigy 2 and the ASUS P5KPL On-Board settings. I can’t do the M-Audio — I modified the card with bigger capacitors to remove the tilt in hardware, so it’s not stock anymore 😉.

    ///Leif[/quote]

    That would be great!

    I did see your write-up on modifying the M-Audio card somewhere with extra capacitors, how does this benefit the audio compared to just using the Tilt settings in BBP? 😀

    #6539
    camclone
    Member

    Leif, can you please be more specific ?
    MPX level control |??|?|?|?|
    i want to increase the mid and highs but keep the bass accurately low..to be sure not losing my radio stations lock frequency.

    tell me some settings and eq himts! plzzzzzzzzz

    #6540
    Leif
    Keymaster

    Camclone, I’m sorry but that’s just not how it works. Overmodulation is overmodulation whether it’s bass or treble swinging the carrier — and in fact, I believe mids/treble will be more likely than bass to cause receivers to lose lock, simply because the carrier moves faster, has more sidebands, and is harder to lock onto.

    ///Leif

    #6541
    Sparky
    Member

    What a bizarre request… but having read the post a few times I think I understand what his issue is.

    Camclone, it appears you have a poorly designed (or broken) PLL synthesizer in your transmitter, specifically the loop filter.
    This loop filter is a group of circuits that generates the feedback control voltage keeping the transmitter on frequency.
    If the loop filter circuit time constants are improperly chosen or wrong, you will have high instability from audio modulation, especially lower bass frequencies. Changing Breakaway’s frequency equalization to accommodate the faulty transmitter is not the way to fix this problem. To do so would be similar to asking a mechanic to remove the doors off your new car because the air conditioner is broken. 😉

    Is your transmitter design a kit and was assembled by you? If so, I suggest taking a close look at the component values in this circuit. An incorrect resistor or capacitor value will have a dramatic effect on how well it works. If it’s of your own creation, then I suggest you find more information on loop filter design and try again. Once you have evaluated your circuit I recommend you use the 30Hz burst tone tool found in Breakaway’s test tone settings window. This will help aid in determining if your changes were effective or not. If you have access to one, an oscilloscope is a great tool to view the loop filter output when the 30Hz tone burst is applied. It will quickly show you how well the PLL is working and it’s stability (or lack of) to a low frequency impulse. If the viewed waveform is wildly swing around each time the tone burst hits, the loop filter still needs work. However if you only see a tiny "bump" in an otherwise flat trace then you probably have it right (or very close).

    #6542
    Lee XS
    Member

    I think someone said the broadcast Warehouse 1watt PLL Module has flat, No Tilt response, these can be had for around £100.

    Also if your exciter does have tilt, how could you measure this using MPXtool? Does this mean you have to get an MPX tuner?

    I await Leif’s PEQ and Tilt results for the Sound Blaster and Asus cards so I run it at full throttle… 😀

    #6543
    camclone
    Member

    heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy , stop!

    My radio station is NOT a small radio station
    The PLL is 35 watt RVR exciter.
    The transmitter is 5.000 watts mosfet technology RVR also!
    The links are 1,7 GHz SIEL .
    I have no tilt problems with soundcards or exciter.

    In SOME recievers maaaaany raaaaaaaaaaaadio stations have this problem to NOT lock on some frequencies sometimes when there’s a lot of bass ..and also good signal!
    This happens with ALL the exciters in the world,
    not only RVR, DB, SIEL, …blablablaaaaaaaaa
    it’s the big disadvantage of FM,
    many types of recievers ,
    some recievers have filters, some no, some have sensitive modulation, some not,
    it’s becuse of the recievers "frequency search tecnique"
    and WE MUST BE COMPATIBLE WITH ALL THE RECIEVERS…
    ..so let’s broadcast…with 75 KHz modulation and NOT 90 and 100…
    let’s broadcast …with 54 KHz modulation …with mpx clipping …for more stability even at bad signal areas…your station always locks to allllllllllllll recieeeeeeeeeeverssss

    #6544
    Leif
    Keymaster

    Hey Camclone,

    The reason why I’m recommending not} to use the EQ in this manner, is that it will make you lose peak control, thus removing any benefit from clipping in the first place (while leaving any distortion in place).

    However, I have a couple of different ideas.

    First of all, I think the Dutch have it right in regards to the ITU-R SM.1268-1 Stokkemasker. They’re (as far as I know) the only country in the world that uses this standard of modulation measurement, but it’s also the one that makes the most sense to me — and the one that seems most accurate.

    The spread of the FM carrier is not just a function the deviation (in kHz) but also of the signal causing the deviation.

    For example:

    All three images depict an FM carrier being modulated at full swing (+/- 75 kHz). The top one is being modulated by 30hz, the middle one by 15000hz, and the bottom one by 38000hz.

    I’m no rocket scientist, but the top one (bass) looks a lot easier for a receiver with a narrow if-filter to lock onto, than the bottom one (stereo subcarrier).

    The ITU-R SM.1268-1 Stokkemasker standard recognizes this, and requires limiting stereo separation so that an FM stereo station does not have a significantly wider footprint than an FM mono station. I believe this helps reception greatly, more so than limiting bass would.

    So, if you’re worried about receiver lock, I recommend turning the ITU-R SM.1268-1 limiter ON. This will ensure a narrower, more controlled FM carrier footprint, and should ensure that your signal is easier to lock onto.

    The other thing I recommend is: LIGHTER PROCESSING!

    No matter what the modulation level is, it’s still easier for radio circuitry to follow along with a sinewave than with a squarewave. Also, if there’s still some dynamics in the audio, then the listeners ears won’t have to focus hard to try to make sense of the onslaught of brickwalled audio, and thus are less likely to notice the natural flaws of FM such as multipath dropouts, since they’ll be more relaxed while listening. (Disclaimer: No scientific or statistical process or procedure was used or referenced during the composition of the previous paragraph. All data comes directly from a friend of mine, statistician Marge Innovera.)

    Try Reference Settings with all sliders in the middle. Yes, it will sound weak at first compared to Plutonium, but listen to it for a while! Don’t tweak. Turn up the volume control on your radio as opposed to the final clip drive. It’s an incredibly clean sound — basically CD quality on FM — and yet only 2-3dB quieter than the loudest, most distorted stations. I believe this light level of processing could work for almost any station, and since you won’t be pushing it hard, bass will not be an issue — any receivers (and any listener!) will be able to lock on and stay locked.

    Best regards,
    ///Leif

    #6545
    Sparky
    Member

    Camclone,

    My comments were not intended to say that you and your station were non professional in scope, rather from the limited information provided I had no way of knowing this, and thought perhaps it was of your own design.

    As a +30 year veteran in and out of the broadcast business and a wireless design engineer here are a few points to consider.

    Receiver lock. Yes as you have pointed out, different brands of receivers have varying levels of engineering quality built into them. Not all brands follow the nominal design guidelines needed to receive standardized broadcast transmissions. Because of this, some people, due to their individual choice of receiver brand purchased, will have a less than satisfactory listening experience. There is nothing you can do to prevent this except to adhere to the broadcast transmission standards of your country as closely as possible such that the largest majority of listeners who do have adequate receivers will receive your signals properly.

    Loss of lock in FM receivers as you describe or have been seeing is not due to a loss of main FM carrier PLL lock. All superhetrodyne receiver designs use an unmodulated local oscillator to convert down the FM signal of choice to a 10.7MHz intermediate frequency. This frequency is then sharply filtered and applied to the modulation recovery circuits (demodulator). The quality of the IF filtering as Leif pointed out will have a significant impact on the quality of the recovered audio and subcarrier signals. All FM broadcast receiver ceramic filters must be engineered to have a sufficiently wide and flat bandpass response, in combination with very low group delay for all of the allotted FM channel bandwidth (+/- 100kHz). Typical ceramic IF filters for FM broadcast reception use anywhere from 150-330kHz of bandwidth depending upon the designers ultimate design goals. In most instances the loss of "PLL lock" you describe can be largely due to issues within the receiver stereo demodulator sub-circuits. A large part of distortion from these circuits come from non-linearity in the phase discriminators, subcarrier filtering, and internally generated synchronous AM of the 19kHz stereo pilot. Signal multipath distortion compounds the problem of synchronous AM of the 19kHz stereo pilot.

    However, there are many reasons why a loss of "stereo PLL lock" in a high quality receiver is encountered that are directly caused by the FM station itself.
    These are: synchronous AM of the FM carrier and MPX subcarriers, transmitter interstage group delay, MPX tilt at the exciter, passband tilt of the antenna array.
    In all my experience in the broadcast engineering business, a lack of symmetrical interstage or amplifier group delay is the most common of the above problems. Many times I personally have seen what this can do to a station’s 100kW FM signal.

    In an ideal FM transmitter the main carrier deviates symmetrically from center frequency regardless of modulating frequency. This in turn generates modulation sidebands with equal amounts of energy. As these sidebands propagate through various amplifier circuits, each frequency group will pass at a slightly different rate such that all groups are not delayed equally in time. However the design goal of a transmitter engineer is to build symmetrical group delay throughout the system which equates to constant group delay or linear phase shift with modulating frequency. But many times the interstage coupling between the exciter to the IPA or the IPA to the final amplifiers introduces significant group delay causing anything from tiny to massive amounts of distortion seen only at the receiver. Throw in signal multipath distortion it’s any wonder a receiver can faithfully recover any listenable audio. Excessive processing with uncontrolled clipping makes a bad situation that much worse. So if the transmitter modulation group delay is large, the MPX signal will undergo lots of phase shifts that will make the received audio and MPX subcarriers appear to "lose lock". You the station engineer need to perform a sweep analysis of your entire transmitter chain (from exciter all the way through to the antenna) to see if this is indeed the case. If the results of your analysis shown everything is perfect, then you have done your job to ensure the station is transmitting a clean signal. The rest is up to the listener and the uncontrollable effects of how your signal propagates around the coverage area. Can’t do much more than that.

    From a design engineering perspective, multi-module MOSFET amplifiers are very much prone to the effects of group delay distortion. Because each amplifier module splits the incoming signal, amplifies it, then recombines the outputs to create the TPO, any slight coupling mismatch will create noticeable group delay, both at the carrier level and MPX modulation sidebands.

    #6546
    camclone
    Member

    Hey,!!!
    Leif , Sparky,

    thanks for your precius time! you saved me hours of searching .
    Excellent presentations.

    This forum board has become very powerfull lately,

    I love your knowledge 🙂

    #6547
    Sparky
    Member
    quote :

    This forum board has become very powerfull lately,

    Yes it has, especially with a brilliant software engineer at the controls (Uber coder :mrgreen: )

    Hey Leif, how about adding another test tone to the set up? 😉
    Freq: 9.5kHz, mono, no MPX subcarriers or pilot. 100% modulation

    Why this frequency? It’s 1/2 of the pilot tone. When checking a transmitter for group delay symmetry, this tone in conjunction with a modulation meter allows the user to see and adjust for any asymmetry.
    When high group delay is present it causes an increase in the even order harmonics of the 9.5kHz tone sidebands. The second harmonic falls squarely within the passband of a modulation meter pilot tone detector (very narrow band filter). If high amounts of harmonic energy is seen on the meter, then asymmetrical group delay is present. The higher the reading the worse it is. Now the user has a simple visual indicator to follow while adjusting the transmitter. Tune and adjust the coupling stages until the 19kHz harmonic nulls out or is reduced as low as it can go. Transmitter interstage group delay symmetry has been restored. 8)

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • The forum ‘Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued]’ is closed to new topics and replies.