Home › Forums › Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued] › High Pass Filter Question
- This topic has 13 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by Leif.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 10, 2009 at 2:42 am #313FBrunoMember
Hi All,
I’m currently using Breakaway Live and wondering what kind of benefits there are for using the High Pass Filter…and what setting would be best…I know the default is 30Hz…I think.
Thanks for your time!
FrankApril 10, 2009 at 3:00 am #7113LeifKeymasterHi Frank!
The benefit is that it filters out thumps, rumble and other sounds that are too low frequency to hear. Very few sound systems play 30hz, and very little music has (intentional) frequency content below 40hz.
To put it simply, the more you can filter out while keeping the audio sounding the same, the cleaner your output audio will be, since anything inaudible is wasting headroom.
Best,
///LeifApril 10, 2009 at 3:20 am #7114FBrunoMemberThanks Leif!
Makes total sense!!
Thanks for a great product…been waiting for a processor like this for a long time!
Frank
April 10, 2009 at 2:16 pm #7115timmywaParticipant[quote author=”Leif”]The benefit is that it filters out thumps, rumble and other sounds that are too low frequency to hear.[/quote]
I would only comment that some of those sub-audible sounds may not be recognized by most ears but decent speakers will still vibrate at those lower frequencies, increasing the impact of some of that low bass. The "invisible bass" that you feel!
April 10, 2009 at 3:04 pm #7116LeifKeymasterIndeed. Broadcasters tend to focus on the things that are audible (as anything else means less loudness), but this is why the high pass filter is defeatable.
Best,
///LeifApril 25, 2009 at 11:34 pm #7117UpgradeMember[quote author=”Leif”]Indeed. Broadcasters tend to focus on the things that are audible (as anything else means less loudness), but this is why the high pass filter is defeatable.
Best,
///Leif[/quote]
Filtering the lower band give benefits also in the AFC loop in the Pll Exciter, giving more stable stero image and reduced channel occupation when observed with a spetrum analizer in "max Hold" , but Why not lower the High-pass to 20 Hz ? , i have measured lots of fm exciter , and they don’t show frquency drift until you don’t go lower to 10 Hz.. so 20 Hz can be a good compromise??Adriano.
April 27, 2009 at 10:18 am #7118LeifKeymasterPhase linear high pass filters cause LOTS of delay. A 30hz brick-wall high pass filter such as in BBP uses 16384 taps (!!). This means a delay of 16384 samples. (Yes, theoretically only half, but you have to buffer at both the input and output.)
A 20hz brick-wall high pass would probably need to step up the number of taps.. That is, 32768 samples, or a full 743 milliseconds (yes that’s seven hundred and forty-three), JUST for the filter. It doesn’t seem worth it.
If I made the filter non-phase-linear, it wouldn’t add any delay at all (at midrange frequencies), but then we’d lose phase linearity — not an option for me. However, you can always add your own filter as an effect plug-in!
Best,
///LeifApril 27, 2009 at 11:10 pm #7119SparkyMember30Hz is also the lower technical limit as it applies to most, if not all, government licensing standards ratified for FM broadcasting.
April 28, 2009 at 11:03 am #7120JesseGMemberNot to mention that most FM stations on a system that can accurately play back 20hz… is not very fun to listen to (compared to CDs, mp3s, etc).
I wonder if some people realize how dang LOW 30 Hz is ??
An open Low B string on a 5-string bass… is 32.7 Hz. And that is REALLY low as far as most music goes. Not to mention even there, any producer with half a brain knows that you really have to enhance the crap out of the harmonics if you have a prayer of making it halfway audible on most people’s playback systems.
April 28, 2009 at 12:47 pm #7121LeifKeymasterI don’t believe most do, Jesse.
In fact, if I ran an FM station, and cared at all about loudness and cleanliness, I’d use the 45 Hz high pass filter.
As an example, the Bose Wave Radio impresses a lot of people (myself included) by how low the bass goes. Then, I ran a sweep. It stops around 65 Hz.
///Leif
April 28, 2009 at 4:27 pm #7122SparkyMemberquote :…the Bose Wave Radio impresses a lot of people (myself included) by how low the bass goes. Then, I ran a sweep. It stops around 65 Hz.Interesting. Is this 65Hz cutoff based on speaker cone physical displacement, or does it include enclosure resonance?
April 28, 2009 at 5:36 pm #7123LeifKeymasterProbably a combination of both (the box is limited in size, even though it’s a folded horn internally, and the drivers are just 3 inches, if that.) Probably has an electronic crossover too, to save power.
My point is, though, that 30hz is indeed much lower than people think. Music *very rarely* goes below 40.
///Leif
April 28, 2009 at 5:42 pm #7124LuKParticipant[quote author=”Leif”]In fact, if I ran an FM station, and cared at all about loudness and cleanliness, I’d use the 45 Hz high pass filter.///Leif[/quote]
Leif, is this valid for Web Streaming, also?Bye. 🙂
April 29, 2009 at 1:46 am #7125LeifKeymasterHowdy!
Nope, not really for web streaming — streaming doesn’t need nearly as much processing, it doesn’t have to be 100% modulation all the time like on FM.
Best,
///Leif -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued]’ is closed to new topics and replies.