Breakaway Broadcast – LOWER CPU USAGE (0.90.66)

This topic has 24 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by celar.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 25 total)

1 2 →

Author

Posts
January 5, 2009 at 8:40 am #185

Leif
Keymaster

Hey guys,

Anyone interested in:

LOWER CPU USAGE? ;D ;D

I’ve reworked the back-end clipper, and the results are in:

Same great audio quality, slightly better peak control, AND lower cpu usage.

As measured on a Celeron 420 machine (1.6 GHz, single core) with 512mb ram and Windows XP:

BBP, 0.90.64 and older:

cpu optimized mode: 65% cpu load
maximum quality mode: 86% cpu load

BBP 0.90.66 and forward:

cpu optimized mode: 50% cpu load
maximum quality mode: 65% cpu load

I don’t have one handy to test with, but it SHOULD work on most Pentium 4 computers now!

Download the latest version from:

http://www.claessonedwards.com/beta/bre … 6_beta.exe

///Leif

January 5, 2009 at 12:33 pm #6168

sebastien.wittebolle
Member

Thank you leif , the last version 0.90.66 run with lower cpu usage on my system.

With my pentium dual core 1,8ghz , 30% of usage. 😉

you can hear the result here : http://radiopop.relay-network.com:8012/listen.pls

January 6, 2009 at 1:28 am #6169

Anonymous
Guest

Thanks. I will test it on my machine the next days.

January 6, 2009 at 11:17 am #6170

Leif
Keymaster

Awesome!

Can we have some benchmarks from some P4, and some AMD users? Would be very interesting. 🙂

///Leif

January 6, 2009 at 11:34 am #6171

Erwin
Member

[quote author=”sebastien.wittebolle”]Thank you leif , the last version 0.90.66 run with lower cpu usage on my system.

With my pentium dual core 1,8ghz , 30% of usage. 😉

you can hear the result here : http://91.121.21.176:8704/listen.pls[/quote]

Sounds very, very good! Also very loud. Which setting do you use?

January 6, 2009 at 12:55 pm #6172

sebastien.wittebolle
Member

Erwin => I use the plutonium preset 😉

January 6, 2009 at 2:05 pm #6173

Erwin
Member

Without any changes on the sliders?

January 6, 2009 at 5:49 pm #6174

sebastien.wittebolle
Member

yes without changes 😉

i use edcast for encoding my streaming.

January 6, 2009 at 7:02 pm #6175

JesseG
Member

[quote author=”Erwin”][quote author=”sebastien.wittebolle”]Thank you leif , the last version 0.90.66 run with lower cpu usage on my system.
With my pentium dual core 1,8ghz , 30% of usage. 😉
you can hear the result here : http://91.121.21.176:8704/listen.pls[/quote]
Sounds very, very good! Also very loud. Which setting do you use?[/quote]

I wish you had better bandwidth. It’s basically impossible to listen over here in usa.

January 7, 2009 at 8:14 am #6176

sebastien.wittebolle
Member

JesseG => you can try this server http://radiopop.relay-network.com:8012/listen.pls 😉

January 7, 2009 at 7:24 pm #6177

JesseG
Member

[quote author=”sebastien.wittebolle”]JesseG => you can try this server http://radiopop.relay-network.com:8012/listen.pls 😉[/quote]

Cool, that works great. It’s too bad the relays won’t use the same stream id, or that their relays are not public, because they don’t cluster on shoutcast with your stream. Oh well. 🙂 Sounds nice.

Hot tip for you:

Get this lame
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jfe1205/LA … 3.90.3.zip
replace the lame_enc.dll EdCast is using now.

Open the config file for the encoder profile, change these values like so:

code :LameQuality=0 LameLowpassfreq=19000 LameHighpassfreq=0 LAMEPreset=12

…and you should get a higher quality stream. With that codec and those settings, I’ve done 128kbps streams that sound better than the 192kbps you have right now. So your 192kbps will see a jump in quality without a doubt. 8)

January 7, 2009 at 8:02 pm #6178

sebastien.wittebolle
Member

JesseG => Thank you , i use your preset with your encoder now 😉

January 8, 2009 at 12:22 am #6179

JesseG
Member

Sounds better for sure. I can also tell which mp3s you have that are encoded with Fraunhoffer, which cuts off almost everything above 16kHz, even at 320kbps. 😛 It’s quite a crappy codec compared to Lame.

January 8, 2009 at 2:20 pm #6180

TRININIT
Member

Was looking for a Broadcast processor for a long time !
I found it !!! Awesome !!!
Great job Leif !

It runs on my PIV 650 (3.4 Ghz) with 30 % CPU usage…

What about doing a VST plugin version ???
It should be great for mastering job..

January 9, 2009 at 9:26 am #6181

JesseG
Member

[quote author=”TRININIT”]What about doing a VST plugin version ???
It should be great for mastering job..[/quote]

There will be a mastering clipper in the future. But that’s it. Multiband *ANYTHING* in my humble opinion should NEVER be used in anything one would dare to call "mastering".

Some people who rely on cheats like that which RUIN albums call it mastering. But it’s just not. I’m probably one of the most diabolically obtusely opinionated people you’ll ever meet, when it comes to dynamics. Because of being a career radio processing and mastering engineer. 😛

In radio, I’m always pushing for the absolute latest in the bleeding edge, for quality and what will allow for that extra little "edge" against the competition.

But for mastering, I’m an absolute purist. I have literally *never* used compression on a single master that I have ever done. Just protection limiting, if I’m forced to (i usually am), and no more than 1-2db peak RMS limiting, ever. And yet…. my work ends up sounding almost as loud as ANYTHING else on the rack. Ruining the dynamics is clearly not the answer to the loudness puzzle.

Anyways… I’m glad you found Breakaway. 8)
Author

Posts