Home › Forums › Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued] › BBP 0.90.87 and ESI JULI@ – Problem!!
- This topic has 12 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 14, 2009 at 10:40 am #515AnonymousGuest
I have BBP 0.90.87 and sound card ESI JULI@ and often it makes certain noises as clack… cluck what it can be to blaim?
I send also a file of sound in order to you hear it makes him in 1 second and in 10 second.
The file is here http://rapidshare.com/files/292846201/problem_stvgr.mp3Thanks
October 14, 2009 at 12:57 pm #8567LeifKeymasterWhat’s the CPU usage on the box? What buffer size are you running in BBP, and what hardware buffer size on the juli@?
///Leif
October 14, 2009 at 7:56 pm #8568didacParticipant[quote author=”stvgr”]I have BBP 0.90.87 and sound card ESI JULI@ and often it makes certain noises as clack… cluck what it can be to blaim?
I send also a file of sound in order to you hear it makes him in 1 second and in 10 second.
The file is here http://rapidshare.com/files/292846201/problem_stvgr.mp3Thanks[/quote]
The problem is on BBP or BBP ASIO?
October 15, 2009 at 6:53 am #8569AnonymousGuest[quote author=”Leif”]What’s the CPU usage on the box? What buffer size are you running in BBP, and what hardware buffer size on the juli@?
///Leif[/quote]
My CPU Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 @ 2.66Ghz
CPU Buffer is 35% – 45%
Juli@ Buffer is 256 sampleWith Digigram in the same computer not made this!
[quote author=”didac”]The problem is on BBP or BBP ASIO?[/quote]
Is BBP!
October 15, 2009 at 7:56 am #8570LeifKeymasterJuli@ buffer 256 may be too low. Try setting it to 1024 or 2048. Remember this buffer size does not change for different sample rates, so 2048 at 192000hz is equivalent to 512 at 48000hz.
BBP isn’t a low latency processor no matter how you set up the sound card, so there’s no point trying to minimize the sound card buffer size — it just runs the risk of glitches.
It could still be something else, but try this first.
///Leif
October 15, 2009 at 1:05 pm #8571AnonymousGuest[quote author=”Leif”]Juli@ buffer 256 may be too low. Try setting it to 1024 or 2048. Remember this buffer size does not change for different sample rates, so 2048 at 192000hz is equivalent to 512 at 48000hz.
BBP isn’t a low latency processor no matter how you set up the sound card, so there’s no point trying to minimize the sound card buffer size — it just runs the risk of glitches.
It could still be something else, but try this first.
///Leif[/quote]
That is to say should I use him in 192khz him I put in the 2048 samples if I understood rightly?
October 15, 2009 at 9:00 pm #8572AnonymousGuestI made but the same again… what other it can be?
October 16, 2009 at 2:18 am #8573LeifKeymasterI’ve seen poorly behaving drivers cause problems like this on certain computers.. Especially WLAN cards often cause problems like this.
Run the DPC latency checker from http://www.thesycon.de/deu/latency_check.shtml
If you see any red bars, your computer has a driver problem, and such begins the tedious work of disabling hardware devices one after another (at your own risk!!) until the problem hopefully goes away.
You may also want to simply try with a fresh windows install.
Oh, and just to be sure it’s not BBP — try BBP ASIO for a while.
///Leif
October 17, 2009 at 1:42 pm #8574AnonymousGuest[quote author=”Leif”]I’ve seen poorly behaving drivers cause problems like this on certain computers.. Especially WLAN cards often cause problems like this.
Run the DPC latency checker from http://www.thesycon.de/deu/latency_check.shtml
If you see any red bars, your computer has a driver problem, and such begins the tedious work of disabling hardware devices one after another (at your own risk!!) until the problem hopefully goes away.
You may also want to simply try with a fresh windows install.
Oh, and just to be sure it’s not BBP — try BBP ASIO for a while.
///Leif[/quote]
I put DPC and it made me red clues as to me you said I removed card WIFI and me it shows these they is good clues?
October 17, 2009 at 3:10 pm #8575LeifKeymasterYes, all green is good!
///Leif
October 27, 2009 at 11:45 am #8576AnonymousGuestLeif yesterday I made bent with the oscilloscope and the JULI@ and the DIGIGRAM.
What I understood they is that in air the DIGIGRAM plays better from the JULI@!
What appearred to me curious they is that Tilt of JULI@ are -1 and Coeff 0
and DIGIGRAM 3 and Coeff 13!!
Very small divergences from the 0 that exist as prequalification in Breakaway!!!October 27, 2009 at 1:15 pm #8577LeifKeymasterFrom those numbers, I’d say Juli@ is the better card. However, both are close enough to 0 that it’s not much to worry about.
///Leif
October 27, 2009 at 4:30 pm #8578AnonymousGuestAccording to the numbers I agree that the JULI@ they is better card of other sound echo of DIGIGRAM they is more Loudness.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued]’ is closed to new topics and replies.