Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 1,474 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Updated edcast #12691
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”radiorio”]or maybe it’ll be riocast v1 😉 [/quote]
    you should 🙂

    also another fun fact that you maybe already know rio, but the meter code in Oddcast/Edcast is actually by Leif too. 🙂 many people don’t know that.

    in reply to: Breakaway & Limiter #12664
    JesseG
    Member

    Personally I would use the slower computer to play music, then run the music and the mic into the mixer, and then run that into the fast computer for breakaway output & streaming. Understand?

    in reply to: A question befor buy #12754
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”carluska”]i have to buy a license for each input ( LIVE 1, LIVE 2, LIVE 3, LIVE 4)[/quote]
    yes.

    in reply to: Updated edcast #12677
    JesseG
    Member

    What Leif suggested is doing that within the confines of his clipper, with the de-emphasis enabled so that the mp3 actually has a tad *less* peaks in the treble. Running pre-emphasis flag with pre-emphasis (and a limiter) in mp3 is the opposite, because it’s trying to get rid of noise that basically doesn’t exist, at the expense of loss of peak control, into a limiter to regain peak control (adding distortion), and then encoded into a codec that already has issues with high frequencies.

    The other reason is you can’t be sure the decoder will properly handle pre-emphasized mp3s, since they really aren’t used ever, that i’ve seen, at all anymore. It’s a nice trick feature to have a fully capable mp3 encoder for streaming, but it doesn’t mean you’ll even want to ever do everything it’s capable of within the mpeg spec. 😉

    in reply to: Updated edcast #12675
    JesseG
    Member

    the limiter is only used for pre-emphasised mp3s, since emphasis destroys peak control. 😉 and (hopefully) nobody actually uses pre-emphasized mp3s. so those are changes that shouldn’t effect anyone.

    in reply to: Vintage, very "big" sound?!? #12644
    JesseG
    Member

    Have you tried the "obsolete" preset INI trick?

    in reply to: Current & Future Breakaway LIVE #12577
    JesseG
    Member

    That’s a tough question actually. It’s all too easy to just splash a ton of harmonics into the bass area, and hope the multiband makes up the difference, and what you gain in consistency is mostly because it makes a lot more things have mushy undetailed bass.

    The controls in Breakaway now are a good start. It’s partially like an Orban where their suggestion is to adjust a bass shelving EQ, it’s partly changing the thresholds, and it’s partly adjusting how aggressive the bass clipper is acting (but not the mode/type of bass clipper because there are 3 you can select from when creating a preset) because of the bass hitting it harder. Increasing the aggressiveness of the bass clipper definitely will create more harmonics, some presets more than others, so that’s something to be aware of.

    Also… I’ve been working on something new that can make certain material sound much larger than it does originally, without harming the peak dynamics at all. Eventually when we have time, I’m hoping to convince Leif that it might be worth while to try it with the fully dynamic methods I’m thinking of. 8) Sort of like the opposite of Undo, for audio that falls into the "very dynamic and also very sparse" category. A good example of such a track is "ABBA – Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!" (although I haven’t heard this song on the Omnia.11 with an OPEN sounding preset, yet).

    in reply to: Current & Future Breakaway LIVE #12573
    JesseG
    Member

    @ using plugins before Breakaway… ultimately what i’ve found is that the more refined the sound of Breakaway is to where you want to go… the more that altering the sound before hand gets in the way of the purity of that place in sound.

    This includes any distortions or phase shifts or impulse responses of analog/digital gear as well.

    Breakaway is capable of being a very pure sounding thing, and overall that’s what everyone that I know personally loves most about it, when they realize that. Undo is really a perfect partner for that. It’s the one effect that makes the most sense, but is also dynamic enough (completely) that it doesn’t get in the way of that purity, but rather enhances that feeling overall.

    I’m hoping some people will try out Passive Aggressor long enough to realize that … sounds like that are the future. One like that which are even more transparent in their feeling, yet also more consistent. This is where I’m going anyways, with my personal processing habits. If when you hear it, and you agree, then you have to ask yourself… why would I broadcast anything that I wouldn’t personally prefer to listen to myself?

    That question has existed since day one, but we’re just getting to the point where this purity can win even against sounds that are decently louder at a given playback gain. Even in the short term. Even on FM. And I can’t wait to see the first station running a 9 with Passive Aggressor.

    in reply to: Talent Voice Processor #12655
    JesseG
    Member

    Get a good VST host, like Reaper or Audition. Then get a VST…
    http://www.voxengo.com/product/voxformer/

    Cheers

    in reply to: Want To Build a Good Audio PC #7515
    JesseG
    Member

    The GPU is about as pro as you can get tho. Quadra offers no advantages anymore. I have a GTX 460 and I can play any game at 1080 usually on maxed settings, or rarely at almost maxed settings, and get above 60 FPS at all times. i7 860, so your CPU is a hair faster too. 300 GB/s SSD as well.

    Btw, the graphics quality BLOWS AWAY the current consoles.

    You’ll be very happy with that system. 🙂

    in reply to: Is BBP able to sound as amazing as FlaixFM sounds? #12630
    JesseG
    Member

    I’m not the one that said it was/might be an 8600. 😉 I have no idea what it is.

    in reply to: Save Settings? #5406
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”Donzella”]Also, is there somewhere that sort of explains each of the current presets and their nuances and how they might be best used?[/quote]
    If you hold your mouse over the preset name in the dropdown, some help text will pop up. I’m not sure how helpful the text is though, as they are pretty short descriptions.

    [quote author=”Donzella”]Thanks to the creators of this software who also choose to sell it at an affordable price.[/quote]
    Yep, Leif has an amazing thing going on here, and even after 5 years… Breakaway is completely alone in its category. 8)

    in reply to: Multichamnels problem #5389
    JesseG
    Member

    You’ll need Breakaway Live, correct. Breakaway Home Theater ("BHT") is a 5.1 core. Just because it has more channels, doesn’t mean that anything is independent. You won’t be able to do that with BHT, you need Live.

    in reply to: Fm Mode #5409
    JesseG
    Member

    It’s not recommended to use FM mode, if you’re not using a hobby transmitter and calibrating it specifically for that transmitter. The audio quality will be degraded to less than the quality of some FM stations.

    in reply to: Is BBP able to sound as amazing as FlaixFM sounds? #12628
    JesseG
    Member

    I tried messing around with French Kiss for 5 minutes… adjust drive to taste.

    You also need decent stereo enhancer settings of course, since that’s a big part of that sound too…

    Have you tried Motor City with the bass down a tad?

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 1,474 total)