Passive Aggressor (yeah, more teasing)

Home › Forums › Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued] › Passive Aggressor (yeah, more teasing)

Viewing 3 posts - 31 through 33 (of 33 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 3, 2010 at 2:42 pm #10490
    Audio
    Member

    Wow, this is pretty impressive… though we could never get it that clean over a 128k mp3 stream.

    In which way would you say the Passive Aggressor differs from Rustonium?

    Are you planning a tease on some "muddy" Rock tracks?

    I’m looking forward to seeing this Passive Aggressor on the next release 🙂

    Audio

    May 3, 2010 at 4:34 pm #10491
    JesseG
    Member

    [quote author=”Audio”]Wow, this is pretty impressive… though we could never get it that clean over a 128k mp3 stream.

    In which way would you say the Passive Aggressor differs from Rustonium?

    Are you planning a tease on some "muddy" Rock tracks?

    I’m looking forward to seeing this Passive Aggressor on the next release 🙂

    Audio[/quote]
    Actually… the source files for both the Hot 10 and AC 10 are Lame V0 VBR, and Lame v3.93.1 "aps cbr 128" gets pretty dang close (especially with -q 0) for streaming. Combined with there not being any pre-emphasis or clipping needed, then I think you could get even MORE clean over 128.

    May 4, 2010 at 3:27 pm #10492
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hey Jesse,

    The AC stuff sounds great! I second the motion on some ‘muddy’ rock stuff…

    Maybe some Crash Kings, (New) Godsmack or Puddle Of Mudd would be a good test 🙂

    I’ve been driving myself nuts trying to get a nice open/clean sound when dealing with Active Rock from the 70’s to 2010.

    As I’ve said before, I think Passive Aggressor may be the key…

    Thanks again!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 31 through 33 (of 33 total)
1 2 3
  • The forum ‘Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued]’ is closed to new topics and replies.