Home › Forums › Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued] › Recommended MP3 Encoder Settings
- This topic has 21 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 10 months ago by timmywa.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 20, 2011 at 8:28 pm #11777AudioMember
Hi Jesse,
Thanks for fixing the link to lame.
I was wondering one thing… in one of your previous (and since delete posts) you mentioned that nothing beats 3.93.1 for contemporary music. What would you say are the major differences between 3.93.1 and 3.98.4? We are currently using 3.98.4 and I was wondering in which ways 3.93.1 would improve our sound…
Thanks & Cheers!
Audio
February 21, 2011 at 8:09 pm #11778JesseGMemberSince 3.94 the focus has been on improving VBR, since that’s really the preferred way to encode an mp3. Unfortunately it doesn’t jive well with streaming, due to most players not having the ability to properly buffer it.
I did extensive blind ABX testing to find that 3.93.1 seems to sound the closest to the original input, at 128kbps cbr. This was done when 3.97 was out, so it’s possible that 3.98.x would beat 3.93.1, but I highly doubt it. Plenty of internal things that they have optimized for vbr have effected the cbr negatively, even to the point where they introduced readily apparent constant audio "bugs" for cbr (even at 320) that later had to be fixed.
Unfortunately "in which ways" isn’t a question that can be answered by me without an extensive analysis of 3.93.1 vs 3.98.4 at a specific bitrate and settings. But again, I would be surprised to find out it sounds anywhere near as transparent as 3.93.1 @ the settings in this topic.
March 18, 2011 at 7:51 am #11779michi95Member[quote author=”Audio”]I was wondering one thing… in one of your previous (and since delete posts) you mentioned that nothing beats 3.93.1 for contemporary music. What would you say are the major differences between 3.93.1 and 3.98.4? We are currently using 3.98.4 and I was wondering in which ways 3.93.1 would improve our sound…[/quote]
[quote author=”JesseG”]I did extensive blind ABX testing to find that 3.93.1 seems to sound the closest to the original input, at 128kbps cbr. This was done when 3.97 was out, so it’s possible that 3.98.x would beat 3.93.1, but I highly doubt it.[/quote]
➡
viewtopic.PHP?f=5&t=1749January 9, 2013 at 1:53 pm #11780NuttySquirrelMemberHello, I’m trying to follow the tutorial in the original post. But I’m unable to download Edcast or the LAME encoder from the below links.
quote :Download the version for Winamp, from here: http://users.tpg.com.au/radiorio/quote :Then, download the LAME encoder DLL: http://stashbox.org/810352/lame_enc.dll … eaming.zipJanuary 9, 2013 at 3:09 pm #11781timmywaParticipantEdcast is here: http://code.google.com/p/edcast-reborn/downloads/list
I don’t have a link for LAME. That’s a JesseG thing.
Thanks.
February 12, 2013 at 6:20 am #11782JesseGMemberI’ve updated the original post, but for the AAC bits we should probably have the final version of Winamp that still included that CT encoder in it linked as well. Tim, you did some research on that, what version was that?
January 9, 2014 at 6:36 pm #11783timmywaParticipantWinamp switched from CT to Fraunhofer in version 5.62. Google for version 5.61 and grab the aac+ encoder from there. Good luck!
Here's the link to 5.61 from FileHippo:
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued]’ is closed to new topics and replies.