Tilt Value of Juli@

Home › Forums › Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued] › Tilt Value of Juli@

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 8, 2009 at 6:11 am #366
    bumm
    Member

    Hi i have a Juli@ or a realtek onboard alc662, in asrock motherboard , Which of 2 cards you recomend me for BBP?
    BBP run in a sempron Le1250 2.2ghz???
    and anybody have a tilt value of Juli@ or realtek hd? i dont have osciloscope!!

    Thanks

    Diego

    June 8, 2009 at 8:20 am #7425
    Leif
    Keymaster

    Hi Diego!

    Out of those two, I definitely recommend the Juli@. Realtek ALC662 is 96 kHz only, not 192.

    I don’t have the tilt value, but maybe someone else does 🙂.

    ///Leif

    June 8, 2009 at 8:33 pm #7426
    bumm
    Member

    Thanks Lief!! you are the best JAJA,,, if someone have this value please post it,
    Run BBP in Sempron??

    June 9, 2009 at 3:16 am #7427
    Leif
    Keymaster

    I doubt it. I use Intel’s IPP library very heavily in BBP, and because of this it runs poorly on AMD processors. Live or Personal definitely runs on Sempron though.

    ///Leif

    July 15, 2009 at 7:11 pm #7428
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Would love the tilt value as well,
    Have asked to borrow a oscilloscope but waiting for when its not being used 🙂

    July 17, 2009 at 7:24 am #7429
    Decibel
    Member

    I use a tilt value of +7. This value gives me a nice square wave on my oscillescoop.

    August 25, 2009 at 2:03 pm #7430
    Anonymous
    Guest

    an AMD version would be great. phenomII 550 are great value, especially if you "unlock" the 2 other cores.
    supporting AMD would fit nicely to the bang for the buck approach…
    testing BBP on a AMD X2 250 @ 3,4 ghz, runs smoothly, with a couple of other broadcast related apps in the background it peaks at 50% Cpu.
    just my 2ct, not sure about differences in codec and compilers and the resulting efforts… http://developer.amd.com/documentation/ … ewave.aspx

    August 26, 2009 at 10:15 am #7431
    Leif
    Keymaster

    [quote author=”pitsch”]an AMD version would be great. phenomII 550 are great value, especially if you "unlock" the 2 other cores.
    supporting AMD would fit nicely to the bang for the buck approach…
    testing BBP on a AMD X2 250 @ 3,4 ghz, runs smoothly, with a couple of other broadcast related apps in the background it peaks at 50% Cpu.
    just my 2ct, not sure about differences in codec and compilers and the resulting efforts… http://developer.amd.com/documentation/ … ewave.aspx[/quote]

    No can do. I don’t have the time to maintain two versions, I’m only one person.

    The price difference between Intel and AMD cpus is marginal at best anyway, right?

    ///Leif

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • The forum ‘Breakaway Professional Products – [discontinued]’ is closed to new topics and replies.