Home › Forums › BreakawayOne › Welke geluidskaart voor breakaway
- This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 6 months ago by JesseG.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 14, 2019 at 3:17 pm #3598warmemanMember
Mijn oude pc, met ouderwets pci slot met daarin een esi maya44 192khz pci, is aan vervanging toe. Ik ga over naar windows 10 op een pc zonder ouderwets pci slot, maar de kleine pci-e. Echter, de maya44 op pci-e gaat maar tot 96khz. Na een zoektocht heb ik eigenlijk geen geluidskaart kunnen vinden met 192khz die geschikt is voor de pci-e of eventueel usb. Het MOET een 192khz met asio zijn omdat ik geen latency wil, zoals ik dat in de huidige setup ook heb. Suggesties ?
April 14, 2019 at 9:20 pm #15197MilkyKeymasterMy Dutch (I think) is not very good, but I believe that you have to look for a USB 3.0 device as the bandwidth of USB2 or lower can only support 96kHz.
April 15, 2019 at 10:49 am #15198Jannes01MemberOne of the cheapest audio cards that supports 192khz i've found, is the https://www.terratec.de/details.php?artnr=12001&lang=en
Don't know if you use BAO for FM? otherwise you don't need 192khz support, so any sound card that supports ASIO is ok for low latency.April 21, 2019 at 11:47 am #15199warmemanMemberIt's only for my own sound on the headphone while i'm doeing a radioshow. But i want no latency. No latency is only possible with 192khz asio. Or am i wrong ?
April 21, 2019 at 6:19 pm #15200Jannes01Member[quote author=warmeman link=topic=5732.msg19997#msg19997 date=1555847232]
No latency is only possible with 192khz asio. Or am i wrong ?
[/quote]
Yes you areApril 22, 2019 at 12:15 am #15201MilkyKeymasterLatency has nothing to do with sample rate. It is the delay between the original signal source (for example – your spoken word) and the final signal ater processing. If there is no processing, the two are the same. If the ASIO buffers are very small, the delay will be minimal, but there may be artefacts, so the trick is to increase the buffer size just enough to get rid of any glitches.
Alternatively, listen to the unprocessed signal straight out of the desk.
April 22, 2019 at 11:38 am #15202warmemanMemberPlease explane..my old breakaway with esi maya44 has no delay at 192khz asio, but with the esi maya44 xte at 96khz asio there is a delay. Only different is the lower samplerate. Please explane..
May 8, 2019 at 4:23 pm #15203JesseGMember[quote author=warmeman link=topic=5732.msg20002#msg20002 date=1555933131]
Please explane..my old breakaway with esi maya44 has no delay at 192khz asio, but with the esi maya44 xte at 96khz asio there is a delay. Only different is the lower samplerate. Please explane..
[/quote]If you are lowering the sample rate, but not lowering the amount of samples used to buffer, then you are increasing the TIME that it takes for audio to go through that buffer (aka latency). It is not ONLY because of the sample rate.
Just like if you increased the amount of samples used to buffer, but did not change the sample rate, the TIME (latency) would still increase even though sample rate did not change.
—
You should be able to use less samples/size in your buffer/s, if the sample rate is lower, because the same amount of samples takes more TIME for audio to go through it with a lower sample rate. Understand? 🙂
Think of the buffer samples number like the amount of cars on a section of road. Think of the sample rate like the speed limit. =)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.