Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
BokiMember
i do not want to advertise here .. You’ll get answer @ pm.
BokiMember[quote author=”Leif”]
Here’s my STL design criterias:* FIXED LATENCY. Buffer latency tends to drift (i.e. increase and increase) with other solutions. In mine, if you set it to 10 seconds, that’s what you’ll get.
Latency will be adjustable. If you have a very stable network you should be able to have under a second of delay.* Local back-up player (mp3/wav/flac) if the link goes down.
* PCM and OGG Vorbis format at the very least (since they’re free to use). Mpeg-1 layer 2 and aacPlus if i can work out the licensing — no promises there. I’ll pass on MP3 — it’s not very well suited for an STL, and it’s not free.
I haven’t started on the project yet, but it’s very high up on my list, since it gets breakaway processing a foot in the door at a few stations. 🙂
///Leif[/quote]
More good news from this project 🙂 i special support back-up player. Good ideas from Leif as always.
btw, about send format .. curretly we use PCM wav 48kHz stereo. That is about 1,6Mbits UDP Traffic thru our WiFi 5GHz 6km link.Keep up the good work!
^BBokiMember[quote author=”Leif”]Yes, putting the PC at the transmitter is definitely the best way to do it, so the STL doesn’t have to send processed audio.
Next on my list of software to write is software for doing a stable STL over the internet. Stay tuned 🙂.
///Leif[/quote]Hmm … that is a good news … i already have WiFi link @ 5.7GHz and STL software (asio support) .. and pc near transmitter. MPX cable 70cm long (found CFD200 a good one for this)
Main problem about this link is Software where it must have some important options, like auto start with windows, asio support etc… After one year of searching i found perfect one for this job.
With Two Juli@’s 70ms latency 😉
Hope Leif’s software will be good as this one and less expensive because this one is overpriced.September 3, 2009 at 1:11 am in reply to: New ASUS motherboards with sound : VIA VT2020 (BD192/24 ENVY #8234BokiMemberactually realtek have low noise.. i tested ALC 889 .. maybe the best one from realtek
# Hardware Features High performance DACs with 108dB signal-to-noise ratio (A-weighting)
# High performance ADCs with 104dB signal-to-noise ratio (A-weighting).But i must mention recommended card from many people … E-MU 0202 .. this is the worst sound card i tested on 192khz I/O.
Both realtek and Alanlog Devices (HD) Onboard soundcards are better.September 1, 2009 at 6:15 pm in reply to: New ASUS motherboards with sound : VIA VT2020 (BD192/24 ENVY #8228BokiMemberASUS do not use Realtek long time ago. Now uses chips from Advanced Devices Company, but specialy maded for them (like AD2000B).
I don’t know about new VIA chips in ASUS boards, but realtek and new AD chips are good. 😉btw. Juli@ rulez
i wonder what will Lief think about this card when he test it.BokiMemberminimum distance from reader to mic, so lower input for mic and use pop filter.
what about room ?
BokiMemberTry to set SR 44.100 – 192.000, NC to 1 to 2
BokiMemberis possible to add peek hold for RTA and maybe time adjust for peek hold?
btw.. great tool
BokiMember[quote author=”camclone”] "Breakaway hardware proccesor " with edited windows xp.. wow! i am dreaming of that![/quote]
I already do that but not with breakaway. 🙂
i try it but some things i don’t like in breakaway sound. I can’t explain.. maybe other day.For your start try Windows called "Stripped to the bone" and put it on some c2d e.g. E5200.
-
AuthorPosts